So do I. Al Gore is the most boring person on the planet. He has the effect of an instant anesthesia on the Democratic party.
2007-07-15 16:03:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Al Gore already stated he wasn't going to run for president. Thank god. Even if he did, it is too late in the game. Not enough time for fund raising. Second, he is an ass. My aunt is in the secret service, and had to cover him. He is incredibly rude. He's all talk. When it comes to actually caring, and getting things done, he can't, and doesn't. He was vice president. If he has all these concerns, why didn't he do anything about them???
2007-07-15 15:59:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by USNA 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
vp Al Gore might make an honorable President. i'm hoping he runs. Gore does no longer have prevented 9/11, yet he does no longer have ventured into Iraq the two. He might have caught Osama Bin encumbered in Afghanistan by fending off the distraction of Iraq. Gore might have persevered the negotiations with North Korea that have been began below Clinton, so North Korea does no longer have nuclear weapons at present. The Senate might have ratified the Kyoto Treaty by now had Gore taken workplace in 2001. we'd be a lot nearer to looking a answer to international warming. with out the cost of the conflict in Iraq and Bush's tax-giveaways to the wealthy, usa government does no longer have extensive deficits to be concerned approximately. the economic situtation of the country could be a lot extra good. There could be much less unemployment. Seniors might rejoice with decrease drug fees below Gore than below Bush. Gore might enable Medicare officers to barter low fees with drug companies. The victims of the Katrina typhoon does no longer have been ignored by Al Gore. With Gore as President usa might rejoice with the honor and admiration of the international it as quickly as had. we'd have extra pals and much less enemies. Gore might fund "No newborn Left in the back of" and it might start to be a actuality. Gore does no longer have torn up the form, imprisoned meant enemies for gratis, or spied on human beings. all human beings might have extra freedom than below Bush. The conflict in Iraq has greater the terrorist threat. by fending off this conflict, Gore might have diminished the threat of terrorism. supplies could have been channeled into extra smart classes, and much less human beings might hate us. Gore might commit time and supplies to different urgent themes, inclusive of HIV/AIDS in Africa, relationships with Latin usa, the war against greater drug intake, human rights in Darfur, 0.33 international debt, and immigration (between different issues.)
2016-10-03 21:46:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well you got your Gore Bashers - including another unreferenced claim that "real scientists" (assumedly the IPCC was made up of "pretend scientists) are denying global warming and that apparently liberals believe them. No link to either a "scientist" or a "liberal" to reinforce this claim of course.
Al Gore can run and I believe he will. He is currently recieving as much as 16% support from likely Dem voters despite not having announced he will run. He is a proven money raiser and vote winner so I do not believe it is too late.
Let him know how you feel - ask him to run.
2007-07-15 16:08:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sageandscholar 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
The real scientists are starting to be heard now on climate change and Gore is beginning to look like a scam artist even to some liberals. For that, I don't think he has a chance and he knows it.
2007-07-15 15:58:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Zero.
If he did he would not win. I know I am a biased GOPer, but I don't think he could. He is too far left on the environment and would be viewed as a one issue candidate. Also, his seeming collapse after the 2000 election (he looked AWFUL) would come back to haunt him. I am sure he is a fine fellow and relatively honest man, but I just don't think he is electable among the general populous.
http://www.dryflypolitics.com
2007-07-15 15:58:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by sbay311 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
He could try but he wont get far, the far left loon club is a minority, his policies don't represent the majority of American beliefs.
2007-07-15 16:09:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Polilical conundrum... 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
None. Why would he split the party and throw it to the Republicans?
2007-07-15 15:57:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by CHARITY G 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
2. Slim & None. & I think I saw Slim on his way out of town.
2007-07-15 16:19:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Slim to none.
2007-07-15 15:57:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
1⤊
1⤋