Why is that?
I suspect this:
Jimmy had morals. George has none.
Agree, or disagree?
2007-07-15 13:05:29 · 20 answers · asked by Blim 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Morality is a measure of what someone does, not what they say.
Jimmy embodies morality. Bush embodies self-interest.
2007-07-15 13:13:56 · update #1
Joanne F. --
Which "he" are you referring to?
2007-07-15 13:26:50 · update #2
I was alive "back then."
We spread bad stuff about the president. We had just survived Watergate. There was no love for politicians when Jimmy was president.
2007-07-15 13:30:47 · update #3
maybe because many of the people who talk about jimmy carter today, have no idea how much of a terrible president he was. The see he is trying to be another al gore, and think, "wow, jimmy carter is great".
If you are talking about is rating back when he was a president, it is most likely because people did not go around spreading b.s. about the president back then. If people acted like the libs do today, they would be beaten in the streets by proud Americans who wouldn't let you talk that way about the president, even if he is a piece of garbage like Carter was. Back then, most of the people had morals and pride, and didn't use public dissension based on lies to play their political games.
2007-07-15 13:13:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
it is all actual yet Obama is President and he isn't annoying a reinvestigation of 9/11. the factor approximately 9/11 is that there is concept that a secret cabal became and is training destroying the U. S. shape and infiltrating the government from interior of. Why became Bush allowed to %. the individuals for the analyze whilst he himself became accused of having involvement along with his secret society? Why did Bernanke attend secret society conferences? those are necessary questions that Obama isn't pursuing because of the fact he's a relative to George Bush and is working for an analogous cabal, merely with a diverse call. The illuminati has sworn to break usa and produce of their totalitarian/authoritarian international government.
2016-10-03 21:31:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
all politicians at this time have a low approval rating. Everyone talks about the bush numbers, but what about the congress?? they are even lower!!! But the media doesn't really talk about that
2007-07-15 13:12:58 · answer #3 · answered by aaron b 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
whether he has a higher or lower rating in the US may be debatable, but he is disliked intensely by the rest of the world! the sooner you get rid of him the better for ever one! he being George bush! but i totally agree with you.
2007-07-15 13:15:18 · answer #4 · answered by joanne f 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Carter was 28% in 1979, so not true and I think they both have morals. Just diametrically opposed philosophies on government.
2007-07-15 13:08:34 · answer #5 · answered by booman17 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No, actually George W. Bush has the record high approval rating.
2007-07-15 13:10:13 · answer #6 · answered by RICARDVS 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Jimmy Carter had some successes, most notably bringing a lasting peace between Egypt and Israel. Bush has had no successes at ANYTHING other than rigging his own elections.
2007-07-15 13:09:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
What is even scarier, is the fact that 29% of the people still can't see that Bush is evil.
2007-07-15 13:11:31 · answer #8 · answered by jackie 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The all-time low since the polling system started is 23% approval.
Bush is at (last I checked) 25% and dropping.
Maybe he's going for that record too.
2007-07-15 13:09:21 · answer #9 · answered by coragryph 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Yes he has morals,
He is trying to save marriage!!
He is aginst Killing unborn babies
2007-07-16 07:22:01 · answer #10 · answered by the d 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋