clinton jailed those who bombed the NYTC in 93, after that no attacks until bush chose to ignore clintons advice. bush ignore bin laden and chose to invade iraq after 911...brilliant...im sure this will deter them.
so bush has kept us safe since 911, by setting a record for vacation time by any US president in history
who are you going to blame when terrorists hit us again?
2007-07-15 10:09:57 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Sure is gettin' DEEP in the politics section....where's my boots?
2007-07-15 10:17:04 · answer #1 · answered by Eye of Innocence 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yes, Clinton made it possible for the terrorists to attack.
Bill saved bin Laden's life 8 times so they could become friends.
Sandy Berger stole & destroyed classified documents in to protect Clinton from the 9/11 Commission Investigation.
The Democrat Party is helping the Terrorists to get more "Rights & Freedoms".
They will be responsible for another attack.
2007-07-15 10:20:08 · answer #2 · answered by wolf 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush.
His mismanagement of anti-terrorism is not keeping us safe. (There are currently less people in the CIA working to track Bin Laden then before 9-11-01). Rather, he has propagandized terrorism as a phantom in the face of Bin Laden, and indeed Islam. The end result is that there is hatred and suspicion between the west, and the Islamic peoples of this world, not safety from terrorists.
Rather, Bush has utilized 9-11 abusively as an excuse to begin wire-tapping (domestic spying), and waging the war in Iraq (which is as unrelated to 9-11 as you're going to get).
Clinton was by no means a model anti-terrorist president, but Bush is even worse. I should mention that Bush actually cut anti-terrorism funding before 9-11.
2007-07-15 10:16:47 · answer #3 · answered by ch_ris_l 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
So many people on here forget that the people making the laws were a Republican majority, when they say "Clinton allowed us to be attacked by terrorists".
Clinton was practically begging congress to create legislation that would beef up national security and airline security, but the airline lobbyists mentioned to the Republican majority, that it was too expensive, and that was the end of that, they got out their turkey carvers and trimmed the Clinton anti-terror proposals so bad, they turned them into only a waste of time.
But what else can you expect from people who don't go any further than GOP talking points, when it comes to political research.
2007-07-15 10:25:10 · answer #4 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
stable grief, are you quite that easy minded or do you actual have faith that nonsense? Do you incredibly have a clue on the subject of the 1st bombing of the twin towers, the attack on the united statesCole, the Marine barracks in Beirut or any of the different Terrorist assaults during the Clinton era? human beings such as you're people who placed the Clown Obama in workplace, you stroll around deaf, dumb and blind and parrot all of the BS given to you thru your Messiah. Pitiful.
2016-10-03 21:18:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You conveniently forget the embassy bombings in Africa; and the fact that the September 11th attacks were being planned during Clinton's presidency.
The blame works his way..if you are lib it is Bushes fault regardless. I will hold the person who is in office as the planning is going on as the person responsible. It seems to me that if they were doing their job then the plans would be discovered prior to the attack.
2007-07-15 10:20:49 · answer #6 · answered by Tater1966 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
did clinton ever get bin laden... oh yeah, that one day out of 8 years in office, ( which just happened to be the day of his trial about lying on cheating on his wife), he did send a couple of missles and hit a camel in the butt. who did more to get bin laden. i would say clinton and bush are both to blame.
2007-07-15 10:17:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
bush is pretty lame. He not only ignored President Clinton but ignored the daily briefings that blantantly stated that bin laden was going to stike on that fateful day.
Guess his political venture to Florida that day was far more important than keeping our Country safe.
2007-07-15 10:30:36 · answer #8 · answered by krissyderic 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I would imagine you and the media will blame the nearest republican at hand.
2007-07-15 10:18:26 · answer #9 · answered by Robert S 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm going to blame you and your left leaning terrorist loving cohorts , does that answer your question freeloader ?
2007-07-15 10:20:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
way to go sweatpea, put the wimpyass libs in their place
2007-07-15 14:14:42 · answer #11 · answered by JoeBagadonitz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋