Yes, but only in a case that has happened only once so far. If a pitcher is the winning pitcher in a suspended game that is resumed later, and he is traded between times and comes in as a reliever for the team he has been traded to and closes the game, he could get the win and the save. A pitcher for the Reds won and lost a game in the late 50s or early 60s by having that happen. Brosanon or something was his name. Even in your scenario he wouldn't get both.
2007-07-15 09:06:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sarrafzedehkhoee 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
No. One condition of earning a save is that you aren't the winning pitcher. In that instance, the pitcher gets a win and nobody gets the save.
2007-07-15 08:55:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by New York Nightmare 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, part of the criteria for a save is that the pitcher who finished the game, all other criteria met, is not the winning pitcher.
2007-07-15 08:49:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by W D 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. MLB Rules #10.19(b) states that one of the criteria for a pitcher being awarded a save is "He is not the winning pitcher." So, by definition, if you're the winner pitcher then it's not a save.
2007-07-15 08:52:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by JerH1 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
No. I am pretty sure that when you are taken out as pitcher that you can't re-enter the game and pitch again.
2007-07-15 12:25:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mark 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no it can not happen. Here is a web site that explains it. the beginning pitcher has to the win for the save to be given to the closer. Here is the site. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Save_(baseball_statistics) hope it helps you.
2007-07-15 08:54:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by videoman 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
no, you would stay as the winning pitcher
2007-07-15 09:28:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by poor daddy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure under that situation
2007-07-15 08:41:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by wizjp 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
No it is not because that scenario will never happen
2007-07-15 08:42:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋