No, I think Obama will break down soon. It's sad to see that, but right now he's not in position to win Iowa (Edwards), Nevada(Edwards or Clinton), NH (CLinton), South Carolina (Clinton, maybe Edwards since he's a native), or Fla (Clinton). Now on Super Tuesday, Hillary is nearly guaranteed a win in both California and New York. Edwards will have many of the Southern states. I don't see any momentum for Obama on a state-to-state basis. Obama needs to pour everything he's got, some 32 million dollars, into NH and South Carolina. The wins will give him the momentum to go with the media hype in order to be a serious challenge to Hillary Clinton.
2007-07-15 09:02:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by LaLyLoo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
international warming has been pronounced using over a dozen different tests i will think of of (thermometers, satellites, climate balloons, sea point, tropopause top, seasonal arrival cases, animal migrations, melting ice, increasing tropical Hadley cellular, boreholes, ice cores, outgoing radiation and so on). So it incredibly is particularly plenty previous doubt that it has got here about. different learn has concluded that human pastime is the likely reason. As for polar bears; there is a few communicate over that. In some places the place melting has got here about plenty, polar bears look doing rather badly and populations are going on. a million or 2 populations are increasing although. this may well be defined by using how there continues to be ice, and melting/thinning ice provides them extra section to seek in. To be common, the impact i've got have been given is that polar bears are doing ok on the 2nd and it will likely be many years previously they'd see extreme decline. people who focus on the upcoming destruction of the species are probably exaggerating.
2016-10-21 09:25:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Much of the Clinton Hype is due to Fuch's """News""" . If Ruppert Murdoch weren't pouring millions into her campaign she might go away. But then who would his followers focus thier hate on.
Obama is a product of the Democratic nomination process which guarantees that they will nominate a looser. It's going to be hard for the Republicans to throw this one. They may have to be in charge when the bill for Rumsfelds Folly comes due.
2007-07-15 08:17:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What are you talking about? The Clinton's are going to be media stars for the next 50 years. Just look at "my Man" Billy, he's been more popular than the "Monkey" president for the past seven years, and with Hillary in the White House..."The Sky is the Limit"
2007-07-15 07:42:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Agapito P 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
It'll end when either or neither wins the Democratic nomination.
As far as carrying them to the White House, that's up to us voters to decide and they're not our only choices.
2007-07-15 07:45:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by shacker2762 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately, it will carry Clinton to the Whithouse, well it may not be as bad, look who she is up against Guiliani-once all his skeletons come out its over, Romney- Republicans will never vote a Mormon, and Thompson, who hasnt entered the race yet because he is scared of people quetsionining him about his ties to Nixon and Watergate.
2007-07-15 07:44:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
i think its is a strong possibility, money wins elections by
buying attack adds, having a positive message does not
carry, spreading fear does.
if those two ran, they would get the women and minority
and young people votes, i don't see how any republican
beat them other than McCain, Juiliani and Mick Romly?
are not that strong to take away the moderate vote away
from that ticket.
2007-07-15 08:04:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not as long as the liberals control the media...
2007-07-15 07:49:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It will carry Clinton & she will take Edwards with her.
2007-07-15 08:30:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by mstrywmn 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can see them joining forces and being on the same ticket. If anyone would dare say anything about them then it would be a racist, or feminist remark.
2007-07-15 08:29:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by RB 7
·
0⤊
0⤋