Ofcourse, I mean as long as she is medically able to have them.
2007-07-15 06:52:14 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
No, Bearing children is not a duty.
It's an act of love to your husband and your baby.
2007-07-15 07:02:59 · answer #1 · answered by eviechatter 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Um well, that would depend on what you mean exactly.? Is it the wife's duty to bear children for her husband, so that means another women should not? And will not? Or is it a women's duty to bear children for her husband so that they may have a family and, well, reproduce? No matter what, a family is about more then one person. So they should both be excited when the child comes, so they should both want it in the first place. After all it's not the husband or male that goes through the nine months of pregnancy. And it's not the male that that must go through the who knows how many hours of labor or have the sea-section. And according to you, the female and/or wife and/or mother is the one to take care and raise the child as well. So she should have a bot more then 'it is her duty'. Because the only real 'duty' or 'job' a human has is to be compassionate
2007-07-16 06:54:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Duty? Well, she, of the two, is the only one able, so it is her responsibility I suppose, the actual physical child bearing part. But he has just as much duty to support her and make life easier during those 9 months, it's not AT ALL a one sided thing.
So, if she doesn't want kids and he does? No, they shouldn't have them, it's not her duty. Same is true if she wants kids and he doesn't, she shouldn't get pregnant. It will end up being a terrible mistake for the whole family if everyone is not on the same page.
Duty is a silly word for this situation, I don't find it fitting.
2007-07-15 06:59:24 · answer #3 · answered by wallsinmyhead 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yes,because my boyfriend has had a vasectomy. Seriously though, having children should be a joyful blessing not a duty.What type of environment will any child grow up in if they were only concieved out of a sense of duty.
2007-07-17 04:54:48 · answer #4 · answered by gussie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean children are like presents from the wife to her husband? I agree but it's not some kind of a duty. It's the fulfillment of the family and not necessary if both of the parents are not ready for such a big responsibility.
2007-07-15 06:59:19 · answer #5 · answered by M?r?? P 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No its not her duty to bear children for her husband. Not all women want children.
2007-07-15 12:14:31 · answer #6 · answered by Panda 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
NO
a child should only be brought into this world when both parents agree it is the time --- and maybe for the woman there will not be a right time in her lifetime, while other woman seem to want to have lots of children
2007-07-15 06:56:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
the babies are the responsibility of both parents - the mother's like the father's. both must be good role models for the babies so that when they (the children) grow up, they can become good citizens.
2007-07-16 16:43:38 · answer #8 · answered by conde_c_b 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
She needs to evaluate the relationship and how well she can raise them alone.
Then she needs to decide whether or not to have a child.
See, kids are guaranteed to be there, forever.
Husbands are not.
2007-07-15 10:39:09 · answer #9 · answered by Puresnow 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's not a duty it's a choice to take care and to have the proof of their feelings for one and other.
2007-07-15 06:55:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋