Should every candidate be allowed to speak at the debates? Befor you answer keep in mind there are 59 republican candidates, some with colorful names like James "Barndog" Barnell and Irwin "messiah" Sitnik.......for the democrats ther are 37 including Emporor Ceasar and Moroe "Vulcanoe man" Lee....... http://www.dcpoliticalreport.com/pres08.htm
2007-07-15 06:14:06 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
It would be a crowded stage! By the way, former gov. of VA Gilmore announced his stopping his bid yesterday.
2007-07-15 06:21:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I like the whole lie-detector/polygraph thing. Hey Ohio, make that your next question. I also like the idea of every candidate given time at debates. It would have to be done over several sessions though.
2007-07-15 08:49:55 · answer #2 · answered by Derail 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. There is so much political BS right now that it is lasting nearly 2 years. If we gave every candidate a platform, it would even extend that.
I think that those you mention, and most others should not even be taken seriously.
2007-07-15 06:45:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with the person who said every candidate should have to take a lie detector test first. That ought to narrow the playing field.. hell we may not even have a playing field... Good idea.. damn good idea!
Just imagine.. truth in government... be still my heart!!!
2007-07-15 07:00:30 · answer #4 · answered by Debra H 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Every candidate should have to take a lie detector test,& drug test first.They have to be a potential candidate.
2007-07-15 06:40:04 · answer #5 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋