That's the kind of irrational all-or-nothing approach we've come to expect from Bush.
It completely ignores the reality that someone can still be opposed to terrorism, and against the terrorists, while thinking that the current steps being taken are not effective.
Bush is a master of the false dilemma, and painting the world as if there were only two possible choices. He's completely wrong, but that doesn't seem to matter to him or his cronies.
2007-07-15 06:06:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
6⤊
2⤋
initially, i've got not heard one single Republican say the Iraq conflict became a mistake. i've got heard people who stated they have been Republicans say that yet they weren't relatively Republicans. RINOS are actually not Republicans. Now, please tell me at what component in existence do you ultimately decide for that George Bush is not President and that Obama is the present President and start to look at what he's doing? purely announcing.
2016-09-30 01:19:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well it's pretty obvious, if you aren't for backing up your country then you aren't for your country. Back in the days of patriosim you stood behind your country even if you didn't agree with it, it was called honor. Now it would seem people can dishonor the country anyway they want to because they don't agree with it's leader. So if we get a democrat in next term then will the States be a good country again? Something not right with this picture!
2007-07-15 06:09:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Brianne 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
In the eyes of Bush , yes
for Mel , read and get enlightened
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010920-8.html
2007-07-15 06:21:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by willow, the yodakitty from hell 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
History has demonstrated that Iraq posed no threat to the sovereignty of the U.S.; no wmd's, and, no ties to terrorist organizations. Iraq was a failed strategy that has led to more instability in the mid-east. It has been a disaster, strategically.
2007-07-15 06:13:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Sure..... if you dare disagree with the needless slaughter of our young men in Iraq, you are an unpatriotic, pinko commy,
terrorist-loving, left-wing liberal. It doesn't matter if you voted for Bush, or if you vote Republican candidates in most elections, the previous smears apply.
:-(
2007-07-15 06:11:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
That's right
And Bush said in 2008 any Republican that votes for another candidate is a terrorist.
Go Team Wright-in-Bush Go
2007-07-15 06:01:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
Only the Sith deal in absolutes.
If you don't agree with Bush's war, you are "intelligent."
2007-07-15 06:02:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Schmorgen 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
President Bush never said what you wrote. Please think of something to say that is the truth and proveable.
2007-07-15 06:13:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥ Mel 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I agree with Mr. Bush.
2007-07-15 06:00:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
2⤊
6⤋