I see from asking questions here and the American answers that just maybe I suspect a literacy problem. Now go ahead and attack my grammar but I can read.
2007-07-15 04:04:13 · 7 answers · asked by bruce b 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, there may be a high illiteracy rate in the cities and the cities vote democratic, but that doesn't mean that it is the democrats fault that we have this problem. Let's look back at history for the past number of years, before this current session, if we want to play the name calling routing. It has only been recent that we have had a democratic senate and house. Up until a short while ago, and under Clinton we had a Republican house and Senate. The president can't do much by himself without the help of the house and the senate. So, even if the president wanted to do something to boost the problems with illiteracy the house and the senate would be busy vetoing it. Now we have the house and senate and we have Bush who is too busy with the war and only with the war. He has done nothing to help out our country on the home from in almost 8 years. It is tryly amazing. He will certainly go do in history, but not the way he expected.
And as far as the illiteracy problem being only in cities, take a look at the Ozarks, they don't even know what a book is. I have a second hone in Mass and we have a town called Davisville, where the saying is, if I divorce my wife can she still be my sister. Everyone is one family. Really scary. There are a lot of towns like that around the country, so illiteracy is not confined to the cities, it's out there in the mountains in the middle of nowhere too.
2007-07-15 05:16:34 · answer #1 · answered by lochmessy 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You SUSPECT a literacy problem? Pick any Yahoo! Answers category and read the questions...is it ignorance or laziness
that you see poor spelling and syntax?
I don't believe Geo. Bush & crew are exploiting this-
but they ain't helping any, either.
As an aside- spelling and correct sentence structure are a personal rant of mine...doesn't change the arguement.
2007-07-15 05:14:30 · answer #2 · answered by sirbobby98121 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NANANANANANANANANA! i won't be able to hearken to YOU!! obamaisgreatobamaiswonderfulobamaisthe... it incredibly is humorous, Democrats think of they'd desire to have a 60 seat majority to regulate the Senate. Idiots. They DO administration the two residences. Democrats take a seat interior of maximum individuals Leaders chair in the two residences. they are the Congressional Majority chief (Pelosi) and the Senate Majority chief (Reid). They take a seat on the pinnacle of the table. They administration the area. in the time of this finished marketing campaign, Obama mentioned that he replaced into the only candidate who had the flexibility to be triumphant in around the aisle and positioned across the events togeather. the flexibility to do this may well be referred to as management, something that the two Pelosi and Reid needless to say have none of. they have been completely no longer able to end something properly worth mutually as. Reagan replaced right into a frontrunner. He have been given a Democrat contolled Congess and Senate to offer him a good number of what he needed which contain tax cuts and a extreme-high quality militia.
2016-10-21 08:56:12 · answer #3 · answered by loy 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He exploits illiteracy and assaults literacy every time he opens his mouth...
2007-07-15 20:03:03 · answer #4 · answered by hippiechickmary 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sorry, but the highest rates of illiteracy in the US are in the inner cities, and those areas vote overwhelmingly Democrat.
2007-07-15 04:12:12 · answer #5 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The USA has a literacy rate of 99.9%, what are you babbling about?
2007-07-15 04:16:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
More drivel from a socialist islamo loving cave dweller.....sigh...
2007-07-15 04:09:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋