English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do they agree with their evil tactics or is this just another example of Bush Derangement Syndrome.

Would they support the terrorists if a Democrat was President?

2007-07-15 03:31:47 · 11 answers · asked by gorgeous george III 3 in Politics & Government Politics

If they don't support terrorism, why do they excuse their tactics while calling terrorists "freedom fighters".

2007-07-15 03:42:30 · update #1

11 answers

They don't support terrorism. They simply choose to burry their heads in the sand and pretend it will all go away.

2007-07-15 03:39:29 · answer #1 · answered by The prophet of DOOM 5 · 1 4

Nobody is supporting terrorism. There are just diverse opinons on how best to control it. Marching into a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 or lying about WMD for a personal agenda is not controlling terrorism. Perhaps if Bush had stayed on the course of controlling Al Queda and capturing Bin Laden, we would not still have this threat hanging over us. Iraq had nothing to do with attacks on the USA and they had no WMD. Bush wanted this war long before America was attacked and the tragedy of 9/11 gave him a convenient excuse. We were blatantly lied to. We were scared and we gave him too much power and too much power brings corruption and lack of accountability. Your logic is like guarding the locked front door of a well lit house while leaving the windows and backdoor totally open for attack. They were not a threat. Now, we have far more terrorists to deal with because Bush made martyrs of over 700,000 people in Iraq. We are hated because of that. Use your brain and think a little. It is not that hard to figure out that Bush has messed up badly on this one. You need to wake up. I have never supported terrorism and never will. The biggest terrorist on earth lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and the sooner he leaves office, the better for the USA.

2007-07-15 10:43:23 · answer #2 · answered by kolacat17 5 · 3 1

No politican in this country supports terrorism (I HOPE). It boils down to what do "WE" want hear. After the country got tired of the war and casualties we have suffered, the Bandwagon started up. It is close to another big election and opposing views with an unpopular President are on the rise.

Has anyone ever asked a politican how he is going to fix our problems? It is like someone telling you they will help you buy a new car. Sounds like a great idea and I am all for it. Get down to it when it comes time to help, HOW?.
1.Give you the money
2. Steal it
3. Give you a loan.
4. Give it to you.
This is not a "hot date" don't tell us what we want to hear. Give us real answers and as it is said. "You can talk the talk but can you walk the walk"
Sorry about the ranting, but until the American People wake up and hold politicans accountable for doing their jobs in the interest of the United States, I will carry on.

2007-07-15 10:55:30 · answer #3 · answered by Russ483 2 · 0 0

Pretty Boy , we do not support terrorism, you have your little blond head confused with the neocon rant. Iraq did not attack us ,Osama did and he was allowed to attack us from Afghanistan soil, that where the terrorist is, the bad man Osama is there only Bush is to stupid to understand that.
He left the war to invade Iraq,and forgot about the real terrorist in Afghanistan( I am not explaining to fast for you am I) and Americans are not signing up to serve in the military forcing the same people to be deployed to Iraq 3, 4, 5 times.

Your question has been answered!

2007-07-15 10:54:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Georgie, Liberals do not support terrorism. Nobody but terrorists support terrorism.

Liberals do not believe in attacking another State, just because its government's philosophy is different, or even repugnant to ours.

We attacked Afghanistan because that country would not allow the US to invade the country and seek out and kill Osama Bin Laden.

Would you allow Cuba to invade our country with the rational that a terrorist who attacked their country is operating out of our country.

No way!

You are right; Bush is a deranged megalomaniac.

2007-07-15 10:44:13 · answer #5 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 0 1

I in no way support terrorist and have never seen an instance where a democratic or for that matter a republicn lawmaker said they did........If you are referring to the war in Iraq......Iraq was in no way involved in the attacks on 9/11....BTW how many people have you heard say that we dont belong in Afganistan? People are all for it since that is where Al Queda is. We fully agree with wiping them out, but you cant do that when you are in the wrong country.

2007-07-15 10:40:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Democrats dont support terrorists. They just dont appreciate having all of their freedom taken away to protect us from people the president pissed off. The war on terrorism is one we will never win it is a fruitless gesture to spend billions of dollars a day on it when they are so bad at home. You are an idiot to suggest that they do support terrorism.

2007-07-15 10:40:40 · answer #7 · answered by darkestsith 2 · 3 1

You've just managed to offend half of the US population with this statement, myself included. Democrats like myself are upset that American soldiers are dying needlessly in Iraq while major terrorist groups are using Iraq as a recruiting tool.

Also, if you even bother studying history, it was the REPUBLICANS - Reagan especially - who fueled the whole Middle East situation by ARMING TERRORIST GROUPS!

2007-07-15 11:34:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

more scare tactics.

you sir, are a radical.

a radical is a person who tries to replace common sense with fear.

dems do not support terrorism - but bush has made it much much worse.

i know who i'm going to vote for (dems - straight ticket for the first time in my life) and never again for the republicans (who can't be trusted with power).

2007-07-15 10:39:12 · answer #9 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 3 1

A democrat wouldn't use the label terrorist.

That could be anyone.
Any freedom fighter - in any country you invade is a terrorist.

Please see how self defeating, absurd and idiotic that label is.

2007-07-15 10:40:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

What I've seen, and you have too, and you know it, is that the number of terrorists are growing in leaps and bounds, under this republican dictator wannabe.

Now, grow up and quit spreading propaganda.

.

2007-07-15 10:39:27 · answer #11 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers