As p.Resident, yes, he's the "buck stops here" guy. However, it's those folks advising him who are actually railroading America. It's my understanding they are somehow connected to, followers of, or in some way involved in a "new world order" - supposedly from the origins of the 'iluminnate' (sp?) As I understand it, they believe some kind of council should rule the world. So, why not start by making the U.S.A., Canada, and South America, the Union of Americas, or American Union, or, whatever the name they are proposing. I have heard bits and pieces of this, and it does concern me.
It seems to be gaining momentum, as 'they' continue to assert the presidential privilege, in almost every dept. under the direction of the president. He does not even believe, or is not complicitous with, the fact that the Presidency is one of three branches of government - nOt the ToP branch - as in a pyramid.
2007-07-13 19:42:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ro40rd 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Some of those are true. Bush has weakened our national defense by warmongering and inciting hatred. Bush has weakened the USA severely, but every president since Grover Cleveland has left the country worse than he found it. The Republican Party has definitely been run into the ground by Bush and that is self-evident. Bush has not really changed the Justice Department all that much. It has rarely, if ever, been a Justice Department rather than an inJustice Department.
However, I definitely don't think its fair to blame Bush for the dollar or the collapse of the Middle Class. The Federal Reserve is inherently the cause of inflation and the real rate of inflation is the rate at which the Counterfeiter of Last Resort prints new money. The Federal Reserve is also responsible for the collapse of the Middle Class because it redistributes wealth from the poor and middle class to the government's employees.
2007-07-13 19:12:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
OK first your statement, not question of Republicans didnt care how their tax money was being used during Bush's blundering of the national debt. Yet democrats are called sheep, odd. These are reasons why I could never be a republican Bush had the lowest approval rating ever. Only 31% claim Democratic affiliation, do the math. Many people all around were disappointed with Bush. Try to at least listen to the other side before you criticize.
2016-04-01 03:34:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jennifer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ya know, I really cant argue against much of that.
The dollar has taken a big dive. Foreign currency trading is a side job/hobby of mine so I know this quite well.
And the Republican Party you can't blame Bush totally for, some of them did it to themselves.
I don't think US labor is that bad off, unemployment is at a very good level, but the military is stretched very thin, alot of loss of confidence due to the veteran treatment etc..
2007-07-13 18:58:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by sociald 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
The problem with your question is it gives Dub-ya far more power to act than he really has. He is a totally controlled puppet of the CFR. They are the ones putting us into the north American union and are responsible for all this destruction of our country! They run our government!
2007-07-13 19:09:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
You are totally misinformed or so biased as for it to be impossible to be objective. In other words you are a lib.
clinton is the one who neatly crippled the military with cuts.
the U.S. economy is robust. Just today 7/13/07 the dow closed at a record 14000. That is because taxes are low and people have more money in their pockets to spend in the economy. clinton was able to amass a huge surplus, I will give him credit for that. However, he did it at the expense of having a stable, thriving economy and in total disregard of the stress a huge tax burden puts on us. Because of this President Bush inherited an economy in recession. Just look at the miraculous advances our economy has made in the last seven years!!!
The US dollar has to be strong because the economy is strong. Yes, consumer goods are costing more and more and the dollar is not able to be stretched as far, but it is still strong.
The rest of the question is not worth my time to address. President Bush is the man at the top, so you can blame him for hurricane Katrina, world poverty, your sore hangnail, r whatever else you want because no lib will oppose you.
So, if you were looking to have your ego massaged by your libtard cohorts, I apologize for fooling your obviously masterful plan for group edification.
2007-07-13 19:03:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by cadcommando2003 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
And the rest of the entire political elite in DC. To blame one person is close minded.
2007-07-13 18:55:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Job1000 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yea, he has totally screwed up everything. You would think the Democrats int he Senate would vote to impeach him. Thus is really bugging me, why isn't he being impeached yet?He has lied to us, tried to sell our ports to the Saudis and sold our souls to Communist China, can't anyone think of a reason to impeach Bush and Cheney.
2007-07-13 18:52:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by oldhag 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
Well, not the Justice Department. Janet Reno did a pretty good job of that when she was in charge. Come to think of it, the military didn't fare so well under President Clinton.
Edit:
With all the thumbs down from the libs, I must have stuck a nerve. It makes my day when I get under the skin of a liberal.
2007-07-13 18:51:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
7⤋
Give it a rest Chi Guy. Every weekend you dominate Yahoo! Answers with spam like this. You really are not looking for answers, just spewing your bile. We got it already you want America to fail and become a 3rd world country, we got it.
2007-07-13 18:52:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋