http://costofwar.com/---------------> Over $450 billion spent
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/----> Over 64,000 Iraqi casualties
http://www.antiwar.com/casualties/--> Over 15,000 American casualties
Bin Laden is still at large.
2007-07-13 18:33:58 · 14 answers · asked by MG 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I think the whole darn government should be impeached. they are all worthless partisan nincompoops.
2007-07-13 23:00:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
cheeney and snow [job] is the problem
one inside the other a front man
george is only the dupe in the middle of the muddle
.......
'' a report to Congress this week, the White House conceded that not enough progress was being made in training Iraqi security forces — the linchpin in Bush's exit strategy for U.S. troops.
At a news conference Friday, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Peter Pace, said the number of battle-ready Iraqi battalions able to fight independently has dropped from 10 to six in recent months despite an increase in U.S. training efforts.
Pace said the readiness of the Iraqi fighting units was not an issue to be "overly concerned" about because the problem was partly attributable to losses in the field.
"As units operate in the field, they have casualties, they consume vehicles and equipment," Pace said.
In another development Friday, Bush's top spokesman appeared resigned to the fact that the Iraqi parliament is going to take August off, even though it has just eight weeks to show progress on military, political and other benchmarks designated by the United States.
However, Tony Snow said, "Let's also see what happens because quite often when parliaments do not meet''............
it reveales they [the govt america [sorry cheeney wanted them to have ] are beyond caring
they [thier leaders and ours ]are lost and spending thier [tax payers and the oil moneys] money
[storing away the ''lost '
sorry ''consumed armanants and vehicles ''away for the next war]
2007-07-14 01:59:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He's not Al Gore or Hanoi John Kerry! My God,he's doing the best that he can in a difficult position.If his father had finished the job during Desert Storm,we'd probably have avoided alot of chaos.Hindsight is always 20/20 though.I'd be more concerned about who will be the next President,hopefully not Slick Willie's wife!!!
2007-07-14 04:01:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, but only because that would make Cheney President and we surely don't want that! I'm not saying things would be worse...Cheney has been a shadow President since Bush got elected. You know that Bush isn't even clever enough to make so many decisions that line Cheney's pockets. We call 'em mistakes, while he takes it to the bank.
2007-07-14 01:49:01 · answer #4 · answered by ArRo 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Nah... -It'd be a big waste of time. He'll be gone in 17 months- anyway. And I hear about ALL I can STAND about him now- as it is. He'll be fading into that Long Texas Sunset before we all know it... -Thank God... :)
2007-07-14 02:00:00 · answer #5 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not worth the effort. Just vote the (unfunny) clown's party out at the next election and write him off as the worst president ever.
2007-07-14 01:55:36 · answer #6 · answered by PuppyPrince 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The self centered, ego-maniac never should of been voted in....the 1st time or the second time.Thanks to him and all his cronies, we definetely need "God to Bless America" now!
2007-07-14 12:21:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
A President must commit a crime in order to be impeached. Being a terrible President is not considered a crime.
2007-07-14 02:01:00 · answer #8 · answered by liberty11235 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yep he sucks worst president ever he f--- ed the country up.
And in the imortal words of Red Foxx he is one big dummy.
2007-07-14 02:09:32 · answer #9 · answered by steve bartman 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Too many innocent lives have been lost, even that wouldn't bring those lives back.
2007-07-14 02:02:41 · answer #10 · answered by belle 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋