English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

All of you who are complaining about welfare and single moms should think about that. Ha!

2007-07-13 17:23:32 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

btw if your son in law paid for his children they wouldnt need welfare, also the government pays for dead peoples kids, thats through social security. not welfare

2007-07-13 18:00:58 · update #1

8 answers

I couldn't agree with you more.
But do you realize what would happen if any girl who was bullshitted into having sex
would just say "
no,."

2007-07-13 17:37:43 · answer #1 · answered by TedEx 7 · 1 2

I'm still providing a lot of support for my kids. The old lady won't hear of moving them out. They are 21 to 34 years old...

BTW, you have no idea what you are talking about. My son-in-law supports his kids and his lazy ex old lady is still on welfare. Oh yeah, the kids are easily old enough to be home alone for a while. If she would dump the nose candy she might find work but then she could claim a disability.

One more thing, how do you explain the three generations of recipients that live in the section 8 house next door to me???

Welfare is an addiction. Welfare mothers often have more children to raise there payments and the kids grow up to do the same thing. There is little difference between them and dope dealers. Both are after something for nothing and the kids see it and follow along.

2007-07-14 00:36:42 · answer #2 · answered by gimpalomg 7 · 1 1

I did not know that, and I do not believe it.

There might be less need for welfare, but there are such things as unemployed dads.

You can't pay for your children with money you don't have.

I don't have the web site handy, but one time I found statistics by profession of people needing state aid.

Turned out that many police officers and military in Iraq ... their families are on food stamps because they are not making enough money, so they qualify for food stamps.

This is true for a lot of civil service jobs.

You'd think with all the rhetoric, that the future of our children was important to America, If so, how come teachers are paid so poorly?

2007-07-14 01:04:39 · answer #3 · answered by Al Mac Wheel 7 · 1 0

It takes two to make a child, in case you didn't notice. Perhaps if we didn't have so many ignorant welfare cows breeding and squirting out kids and expecting the government to look after them, there might be less need for welfare.

2007-07-14 00:52:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Hahaha this may be the stupidest, most unfound statement I have ever heard... Hey you believe that my Unicorn says hi!!

A. Where are your facts
B. What about people on welfare who have moms and dads
C. What about single parents who don't rely on someone else to support them and do very well.

I will stop because I am using logic in a clearly un-logical question/statement.

Quit blaming others!!!

2007-07-14 00:36:13 · answer #5 · answered by craigblitz 2 · 1 2

what about sperm banks, if a woman gets artificially inseminated, should the donor be required to pay for that child too? What about fathers who die? What then?

2007-07-14 00:35:45 · answer #6 · answered by JBS7878 3 · 0 2

and if everyone worked, there would be no poor


and if we all were nice, there would be no war





there all these crazy ideas, but they will never happen.

2007-07-14 00:31:22 · answer #7 · answered by devinthedragon 5 · 1 1

you need to get a clue.

2007-07-14 00:41:24 · answer #8 · answered by gen. patton 4 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers