2007-07-13 17:18:55 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
vatican city
2007-07-13 17:21:38 · answer #1 · answered by songndance1999 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I would not. I do not have the power to, for one thing. It would not be peaceful if any nation was destroyed. You cannot destroy something in hopes of peace, anymore than you can create something out of nothingness. You can only work with what is put in front of you.
2007-07-14 00:23:48 · answer #2 · answered by Ziggy Stardust 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Iraq
2007-07-14 00:22:28 · answer #3 · answered by Tazmiamor 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Kentucky
2007-07-14 00:22:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
If you destroy a nation how do you expect Global Peace?
This sounds like something Bush would do.
2007-07-14 00:22:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
If world peace demands human collateral, is it worth it? The ends don't really justify the means.
2007-07-14 00:23:38 · answer #6 · answered by Muzer51 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Israel
no offense to any Jews out there, but that WOULD end 90% of the conflict in that part of the world
2007-07-14 00:23:53 · answer #7 · answered by Emtie El © 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
well i was gonna say Antartica, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE POOR WITTLE PENGUINS???? Then i was gonna say Artica, but no SANTA LIVES THERE!! If we have to to hurt people to create peace, it wouldnt really be peace now would it?
2007-07-14 00:28:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
My life and all my possetions and my last will and...
I think that is all that is possible to sacrifice, but if there is anything else, that too.
2007-07-14 00:22:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
antartica If it's considered a nation
2007-07-14 00:21:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Iraq.
2007-07-14 00:21:58 · answer #11 · answered by Cat 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋