English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-07-13 16:23:43 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

Let's just do that and get this bullshit over with already.

2007-07-13 16:24:31 · update #1

Well. I'd say lets not leave them any options on the matter. Either they do.....or we do.

2007-07-13 16:30:24 · update #2

I think it would be an economic boom of huge proportions. for everyone. But if they don't want to. I'd let them know to expect about 12 million rather quick like.

2007-07-13 16:39:03 · update #3

Either that or we take them by force.

2007-07-13 16:40:39 · update #4

Spokesman for the FBI: You can stick the gun control laws up your a55. Thank you. ;)

2007-07-13 16:46:01 · update #5

Another star wouldn't hurt anything.

2007-07-13 16:47:33 · update #6

While we're at it we need to go ahead and make Puerto Rico a state as well. Along with the Virgin Islands. Then have a nice long conversation with Canada after that.

2007-07-13 16:49:06 · update #7

Just think of how much money we would save on a fence.

2007-07-13 16:54:47 · update #8

Then all the infrastructure we would have to build down there. Trillions worth!!! The possibilities are just endless.

2007-07-13 16:56:07 · update #9

Of course another requirement would be they would all have to learn English.

2007-07-13 16:58:29 · update #10

Oh and for us sportsmen, they do have really good bass fishing down there as well.

2007-07-13 17:00:26 · update #11

They could keep their flag as well. Just redesignate it as a state flag. Of course they would have to fly Old glory above her, but its a very small price to pay for progress and economic prosperity, right?

2007-07-13 17:04:03 · update #12

ZH: We just overrun them and turn their a55ses into a state. Problem solved.

2007-07-13 17:36:35 · update #13

They also be required to pledge allegiance to the United States.

2007-07-13 17:38:29 · update #14

All of them.

2007-07-13 17:39:41 · update #15

sentrynox: Nah, they're scratching their heads right now. They know its a damn good idea.

2007-07-13 17:56:07 · update #16

and as for all the soon to be EX-MEXICANS.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JJ7oGHwMTI

;)

2007-07-13 18:08:20 · update #17

Thats ok Sentrynox: We'll just need to brinmg our troops home from Iraq.
Close down approximately 97 bases world wide(they know which one as well) and bring those personnel home to get ready for "Operation Mexico Sweep ." Of course this would include hiring blackwater in as well, doubt if they would mind anyways.

2007-07-13 18:19:59 · update #18

To Spock: Hell no they don't get a vote. either they do it peacefully or we do it for them.

2007-07-13 18:28:50 · update #19

9 answers

I posted a similar question previously basically stating that there are somewhere near 120 million in mexico. The last amnesty estimates had around 20 million or so would get it. So basically you are assimilating around 1/6 - 1/7 of a countries population. At what point does the originating country do something in exchange?

2007-07-13 17:34:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Annexation cannot work in these days, peoples are just too much proud of their origins. It is why the CFR want to incorporate those nations under an umbrella of North American Union, and blur the line between annexations and economic partnership.
Those bankers are pretty much clever, they know that forcing the US in an unwinable war, will require the US to spend so much money, as to force them to unite with Canada and Mexico, to pay the bill for them!! Those bankers can`t lose anymore, they are way above average in intelligence, and have got a 50 years (conservative estimates) time period to think about the implementations of their strategy.

I guess you knew about this, but you were trying to stirr up the pot to create reactions... So little bubbles... ;)

Edit: but you know that adding them, will increase the economic burden of the US, as Mexico lack a lot of public infrastructures, and are just too much corrupted to believed! Anyways, if it works, it will gives a lot of headaches to the civil planners!!!

2007-07-13 17:45:14 · answer #2 · answered by Jedi squirrels 5 · 1 0

NO. ( Darn, I agreed with Siervocal?!) Loretta - Hon, I do not know what History booklet you've got been studying, however you have got to quit. The United States of America is composed of fifty states and one federal district, the District of Columbia. The United States additionally holds a number of different territories. Palmyra Atoll is the United States' handiest integrated territory; however it's unorganized and uninhabited. The United States Minor Outlying Islands encompass uninhabited islands and atolls within the Pacific and Caribbean Sea. In addition, when you consider that 1898, the United States Navy has held an broad naval base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. In addition to the genuine states and territories of the United States, there also are countries which might be "related states" of the U.S. The Federated States of Micronesia (when you consider that 1986), the Marshall Islands (when you consider that 1986), and Palau (when you consider that 1994) are related to the United States beneath what's referred to as the Compact of Free Association, giving the states global sovereignty and perfect manipulate over their territory. However, the governments of the ones places have agreed to permit the United States to furnish protection and fiscal help. Our "territories" are: American Samoa Guam Northern Marianas Islands Puerto Rico U.S. Virgin Islands

2016-09-05 08:54:04 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

That seems a bit extreme, but it may solve the "illegal" problem there is on this side of the border. Then while we are at it let's get Canada as well. All North America one country. Can you even imagine the multitude of problems this would create? And my final answer is no we should not annex Mexico.
Peace.

2007-07-13 16:37:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

LOL you are really stuck on this ain't ya! I love you for it LOL

No we can't make them a state then we would have the whole counrty to deal with at least now they come here and work if e just go on and make them legal they would just quit work and draw a check. Just leave well enough alone when it comes to that some of these politicians hear that and the next thing you know we have to add another star to 'Old Glory'

2007-07-13 16:36:47 · answer #5 · answered by in His image 6 · 0 0

Yeah, we need a few hundred million people living off of our wages. Great idea.

2007-07-13 16:57:11 · answer #6 · answered by Biggg 3 · 0 1

No! Annex Canada instead and adopt its gun control laws. The USA will have less problems as a result.

2007-07-13 16:33:11 · answer #7 · answered by Spokesman for the FBI 1 · 0 4

LoL Joe... I feel your frustration..

2007-07-13 19:31:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

do Mexicans get to vote on this?

I think they'd vote "No!" in multitudes.


:\

2007-07-13 16:29:03 · answer #9 · answered by Spock (rhp) 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers