2007-07-13 15:05:14 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I wouldn't put anything past President Bush, he would do anything to stay in power and prove himself more powerful than anything and anyone in the world.
2007-07-13 15:07:48 · answer #1 · answered by thefuturemrscena 3 · 3⤊ 6⤋
I've said this many times before: This question, in all its various forms, never ceases to make me laugh. Never.
Let's see, "Dictator" Bush engineered something as complex as 9/11, involved THOUSANDS in a cover-up, yet couldn't put a SINGLE WMD in Iraq? Gimme a break!!!!
What's really incredible is that in the U.S. you can't get ONE person to keep a secret let alone the thousands it would have taken to perpetrate an "inside job".
2007-07-13 15:14:14 · answer #2 · answered by Bumblebee711 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Gee I heard there were real idiots out here in Internet land, but thought people were exaggerating. Is he a dictator now.
It was a liberal Supreme Court that ruled on eminent domain allowing a local government to seize your property to build a motel or shopping mall. The two most recent appointees were not there yet and it looks like they would have voted against it.
You seriously need to look around and see who is taking your Constitutional rights away. Art 1 Freedom of speech attacked by fairness doctrine. Art 2 Right to bear arms. ACLU, every liberal around. Right to own property. = eminent domain. No I didn't remember which article for the right to own property but I know its in there. At least I am not as naive as you are. I might even have my articles mixed up right now.
It's Friday been a long week.
2007-07-13 15:14:30 · answer #3 · answered by Rick D 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
That would be impossible. Bush was not involved in attacking New York City on September 11, 2001
2007-07-13 15:09:02 · answer #4 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The Congress of usa, inclusive of maximum contributors of the Deomocratic occasion voted for the invasion. do no longer ignore the failure of the United international locations to enforce their own resolutions on the subject of weapons of mass destruction. international conflict i became into began because of the fact of entangling treaties - a conflict generated with the aid of the loss of life of two human beings. Its in the historic previous books, yet you ought to study to ascertain.
2016-10-01 13:48:48 · answer #5 · answered by gammons 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Easy Michael, you did ok with Roger and Me, and Fahrenheit was cute, but, just because you and Algore bombed on the last try, don't bring your trash talk to Yahoo, mr. Moore
2007-07-13 15:09:43 · answer #6 · answered by T C 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Probably. See my 360 for my new theory.
2007-07-13 15:09:21 · answer #7 · answered by Enigma 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Looks like someone made the keyboard "user friendly" for morons!
2007-07-13 15:08:36 · answer #8 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Do you really believe what your saying???Or looking to see if anyone has a mind like yours.
2007-07-13 15:12:03 · answer #9 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Grow up
2007-07-13 15:07:34 · answer #10 · answered by booman17 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋