If Hilary were president back during Rev War would she pulled troops ,or would she let'em stay and U.S. win

Question

I know Hillary wants to pull the troops out (at least that's what she says) Would we have won the Rev War with a president like her, what about Clinton, Kennedy, Wilson, Taft or others?

Answer 1

There is no comparison between our own war for independence and the war in Iraq. The war in Iraq is an unnecessary war with a country who posed no threat to America.
If there is any similarity, at all, between the two wars, it would be, that in the war in Iraq, it is the Iraqi, who now is fighting an occupier.

Answer 2

She probably would have fought on - after all the Revolutionary War was very different from any other war that we have fought. We were fighting for our dream: a free and independant United States.
Though I don't personally like her, I agree that she has the leadership qualities to have seen us through a revolution.
I also believe that we could have won the Revolutionary War with Bill Clinton, Jack Kennedy, Woodrow Wilson, Howard Taft or many of our other presidents.

Answer 3

Hillary Clinton is a communist! It would have been known as the Civil war before there was the Civil war and not the Rev war. George Washington would lead the military against her and the military would follow. She would have done everything to stop the constitution from being written and the declaration of independence from existing. America would be in bondage and equal rights and revolution would never take place.
The truth is any modern-day president would be a threat unless they already knew what was going to happen. Politics are a mess and our freedoms are being destroyed because our evil government wants power over the people and our constitution is the only thing saving us from total chaos.
George Washington is the only president we ever had who stayed true to the cause of a war. Thank those men who fought and dies for us and our freedom. And save us from the Clintons and Bushes and other tyrants in our government!

Answer 4

The 1st question one has to ask - Were they a signer of the Declaration of Independance? If they were & had any loyalty to their fellow signers, they would have stayed to course. On the other hand if they weren't signers it would be unlikely they'd even have the opportunity to be president.

If one takes a close look at that time in history one would be hard press to see why the colonies went to war. The US, individual, was richer than most & taxed liker. Prior to the French & Indian war the colonies had mostly governed themselves. At the time of the declaration England was attempting to take control back.

Hillary wants to control! The reason she is against the war in Iraq isn't because she cares about the people, soldiers, or the cost. She is all about POWER. AT the moment she is out of power.

Answer 5

Name one notable achievement of Hilary in her 59 years on this planet, there are none. That with the combination of her voting record, the graveyard in her closet, her polarizing image and middle America's stance on national security means it will never happen. Regarding Darfur, Liberals must have a very short memory. What make you think a Clinton would send anybody to Darfur, Bill sat back and did nothing while 1 million people were hacked to pieces in Rwanda.

Answer 6

Women were not allowed to do anything back then except cook, sew (flags and such), churn butter, milk cows, and build row boats. They were not allowed to vote. Washington was our commanding general, our first prez, and the father of our country. OK, I made up the building row boats. Draft dodging Bill would have taken Hill to Canada, Kennedy would have sent the British home with their coattails between their legs, I don't know about the others, but since this is all hypothetical, we would have kicked the Brits butts whoever was in charge, even you!!

Answer 7

Thats dumb because the troops were not in Great Britian. And we didnt have a really good navy, and most of the troops were militia, and simple farmers. Also there was no president, congress, and no formal government. Plus women rarely had any say during that time period.

Answer 8

That's the silliest analogy I've ever seen. Particularly as the state of the world in the late 1700s would have meant Hillary had few rights and would not have even been able to vote let alone be a military commander. That being said a Conservative is usually looking backward toward the 'good old days' and so the modern Conservative was the Revolutionary era Tory/British sympathizer.

Answer 9

Um pull the troops to where? That war was fought on American soil. The solders were already there. Plus remember Washington retreated several times during that war. He knew that sometimes backing off is the best strategy.

Answer 10

That's what the problem with John Kerry was too, wishy-washy. Clinton supported going to war, but now that she's running for president she says it was a mistake. Tell that to my brothers, my cousin, my neighbors son and my step-daughter. All putting their lives on the line to protect you.
Most presidents would see that our troops were supported with everything they need. What do you think Eisenhower went through with WW2?