English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

conglomerate
shale
both
or none?
thank you for all your help.

2007-07-13 10:49:31 · 5 answers · asked by na 2 in Science & Mathematics Earth Sciences & Geology

5 answers

Conglomerate.

Think of a mountain stream, a typical high-energy environment. The stream bed is composed of larger rocks, since smaller clasts will be carried in the stream's suspended load, leaving only the larger rocks. The steam bed can (eventually) form a conglomerate.

Shale is composed of finer grains. Therefore, this indicates a very low-energy environment - low enough that there was not enough energy to to suspend the tiny clasts.

Hope that helps!

2007-07-13 11:18:38 · answer #1 · answered by Jessica H 2 · 1 0

Not shale.

The smaller the grain size of a sedimentary rock the lower the energy of the environ it wass deposeted in.

So for a river coarse sands and gravels, cobbles and boulders.

So to answer your Q conglomerate, which is a sedimentary rock composeed of fragments of other rocks.

Clays and silts need nice calms water in order to settle out in like an estuary.

2007-07-14 12:53:48 · answer #2 · answered by Will T 4 · 0 0

None. A high energy environment implies mountains/volcanos so normally would be associated with igneous or metamorphic rocks.

2007-07-13 17:58:36 · answer #3 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 0 1

smooth river rocks

2007-07-13 18:09:04 · answer #4 · answered by Cow Girl 2 3 · 0 0

I would say... shale. I say that because it is always near waterfalls...

2007-07-13 17:52:56 · answer #5 · answered by a-mac 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers