Assuming that it is a sin to lie. Why do NeoCons choose lying over heaven almost every time.
2007-07-13 08:57:29 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This question is a nobrainer-Redstaters hatred of Clinton is so deep that they would rather lie about him then go to heaven. Not that it matters because their hatred is do deep that it will prevent them from entering the pearly gates anyway
2007-07-14 04:45:11 · answer #1 · answered by xg6 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All I can say is "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky" and in addition to that...assuming that it IS a sin to lie (as you say)..."it all depends on what your definition of IS is". Also, in case you wondered, "I tried pot, but I never inhaled."
2007-07-13 16:00:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Heaven, regardless of what you think ,one doesn't have to lie about Clinton..
2007-07-13 15:59:53 · answer #3 · answered by bereal1 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lying about Clinton, of course. What a silly question. I thought everyone knows that.
2007-07-13 16:00:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's the way of American politics any more... It's not just The RedStaters doin' it Shorty, it's the BlueStaters too.
I find it rather repulsive myself.
2007-07-13 16:21:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think you are goofy. In a Red State, there are Democrats and Republicans. There are liberals and conservatives. From the way you use "neo-con" I suspect you don't know what it means.
2007-07-13 16:02:44 · answer #6 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Whining about the BJ between 2 consenting adults while molesting kids secretly and soliciting gay sex for $20
2007-07-13 16:02:20 · answer #7 · answered by Sean 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Maybe William Jefferson can answer that one since libs are perfect
2007-07-13 15:59:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋