Karl Marx said: "Philosophy is to the real world as masturbation is to sex." Agree or disagree and why?

Answer 1

I can't argue strongly with his analogy, the point of which is that in each case an ideal is being sought, and I will offer some qualification upon his notion for those who might disagree.

Marx does not suggest by any presupposition that the philosopher might only dream about or analyze life while never having lived it and it is here that I have to paint over any gray area of doubt. Without bring in his direct experience of life, and perhaps some extra measure of very rich and well lived experiences, a would be philosopher could seldom arrive at any useful conclusions to his logical inspections. I cannot imagine how unsuccessful and off the mark a philosophy might be without its first drawing upon the real world for the irreplaceable resources of very real and completely accountable data.

To draw upon mere ideas of others or from some inaccurately historical account of reality could only result in a less that usable philosophy. I am speaking here of the philosophies of religious belief, of course.

[][][] r u randy? [][][]
.

Answer 2

I agree - but that doesn't mean that I like it!
The majority of the world functions and will continue to do so completely ignorant that there is anything called philosophy.
-This is a great quotation though in that it reflects Marx's view that, "Philosophers hitherto have merely interpreted the history when the point is to change it!"
--And to Mike W, Karl Marx had children!

Answer 3

I agree that Karl reported it. Why do I agree that he reported it? properly, i do no longer in all possibility recognize. i've got heard it reported that Karl Marx reported it. i do no longer in all possibility recognize everyone who reported that Karl Marx reported that 'faith is the opium of the individuals.' and that i don't recognize Karl Marx, the two. So, i assume the question will become, "Is faith the opium of individuals?" i don't recognize. i assume some non secular people use opium. Prisons are crammed with drug offenders who've grow to be Christians, ordinarily as a results of fact parole boards desire lickspittle Christians over self-helpful atheists. possibly a extra helpful question could be, "Is faith the opiate of the individuals?" wherein case one would desire to speculate that an unsubstantiated wish for extra helpful residing situations after one dies could have a tendency to make enduring the unsatisfactory situations interior the present existence extra bearable. yet then, one would desire to equate the providers of such unsubstantiated hopes with one's community drug pushers, in that the two furnish an addictive product in replace for money and a level of administration over one's existence. guy or woman shoppers could would desire to come to a determination for themselves no count if or no longer the product replaced into properly well worth the fee. individually, i exploit neither drugs nor faith to make my way in this international, seeing the two as a hardship to sparkling theory and private freedom. I regard providers of the two to be not extra helpful than easy leaches, sucking the lifeblood out of their unlucky shoppers to pay for his or her very own opulent existence. ensuring habit to the two product is reprehensible to my ethical sensibilities, and everyone who tries to accomplish that would desire to have their ability to accomplish that limited. it is basically my opinion . . .

Answer 4

Sure, I agree. Sex by yourself is ultimately empty and pointless. And thinking and talking endlessly about the world without ever engaging it to test your theories and try to make things better is just a waste of time.

Answer 5

the analogy is crude and incomplete, but the point is good.

The philosopher spends his life speculating about an amazing foreign land. He speculates about how it would be there, theorises about its wonders, and slowly keeps on perfecting the definitive guidebook.
But he never goes to this wonderful land.

The sage lives there.

Answer 6

Agree, because you don't really do anything with thought. If you act with it, though, you can accomplish a lot more than sex does.

Answer 7

Sounds about right to me, I enjoy both quite a bit. LOL

Answer 8

Perhaps masturbation was the only "sex" he ever got.

Answer 9

Do not agree. If he has meant both are in isolation he is assuming.

Answer 10

Sort of agree. It is realistic, but not real.