Since when do the candidates get to dictate who is invited to debates? it is up to the sponsor of the debate to offer invitations.. I guess Edwards and Clinton want to stifle as many voices as possible.. Ahh i can see my freedoms eroding in Jan of '09"...
And don't give me this crap.. well they are the leading candidates.. Um last time I checked they haven't won any elections yet. Give the other candidates a chance. remember everyone thought dean was the fron runner in 04.. hahhaha how did that work out "Yalll"
2007-07-13 07:12:09 · 9 answers · asked by alexg114 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
http://www.wluctv6.com/Global/story.asp?S=6784011
2007-07-13 07:14:38 · update #1
Uhhh xxx, why don't you answer the question..
And Im sure you don't mind giving up your freedoms.. but I do
2007-07-13 07:17:50 · update #2
I advised everyone against her when she started to show interest in running a year or two ago, she is not the next female president.......I truly wish we had a great female running for president, but Hillary is not the one, believe me......
She hides things, makes things skewed, makes the current president look bad, etc.....She seems more like a cat fighter trying to claw her way to ownership, I mean president.....lol
Look at her beliefs and values, look at how she turned the other way when Bill was goind through his scandal.....She supported her husband, cheating or not.....
So cheaters will get a deal from her? lol, I vote against her now, my ex might vote for her, but he left me.......
2007-07-13 07:18:55 · answer #1 · answered by kaliroadrager 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
These democrat front runners have not been shy about letting people know their plans for total control. They are very good wordsmiths and their constituents are not understanding what is really being said. If they get elected these same whiners of the Patriot act today will long for the freedoms they use to have back when they had the patriot act.
2007-07-13 07:42:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Theyve been deciding for decades.......when was the last time the dems and repubs allowed a third party to debate?.....goes on every election,,,,thats why you dont see ole billy bob that got 3 votes in the primary up on the stage during debates
2007-07-13 07:15:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary and Edward are both so far left that they are basically Communists. And, people of that ilk never give anyone else an even break. They can't afford to. In any fair contest they will lose.
2007-07-13 07:37:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are doing what they always do.......I'm sure Obama BinLaden is gonna have something to say about it though. Hillary can't stop him. If Bloomberg runs independent though it won't even matter because he will take enough of the Democrat vote to get a Republican elected for sure.
2007-07-13 07:15:32 · answer #5 · answered by no jap crap 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
first step in their cunning plan is to curb the amount of loser candidates in there so called debates ,then the
second step ,is to enact "the fairness doctrine"
good old Dixiecrat's keeping Americans in the dark for centuries
2007-07-15 03:07:01 · answer #6 · answered by mark t 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This shouldn't surprise you. Democrats always wish to silence the opposition by any convenient means, even if the opposition is internal.
2007-07-13 07:15:12 · answer #7 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What are you talking about? You sound like you need to sit down, take a load off, and have a Coke...relax...your going to burst something bad and then bleed all over your carpet. 'Dats no good...
2007-07-13 07:15:46 · answer #8 · answered by xxx 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.wluctv6.com/Global/story.asp?S=6784011
I appears so
I think they are about to join each other and undermine Obama
2007-07-13 07:14:27 · answer #9 · answered by Antiliber 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋