Are they putting America's best interests or their own interests first?
This attempt to subvert choice in America will be the first of many if these snakes are elected.
And is the fact that a FOX news microphone happened to catch them saying this the reason libs think FOX is somehow unfair? Is that because the rest of the media, what they think is unbiased, would not report this?
http://www.drudgereport.com
http://www.wluctv6.com/Global/story.asp?S=6784011
2007-07-13 06:29:53 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They're lawyers, how do you expect them to act, ethically? That'll never happen.
2007-07-13 06:33:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If you look at the overall view of the rights and choices of the American people being snatched you will see that it's been going on for quite a while.
Believe it or not the OJ trial got so many civil rights taken it's hard to believe a double murder could have such far reaching affects.Law enforcement grew in their ability to kick down doors and have unsigned warrants and all kind of stuff.
While liberals point at Conservatives and vise verse nobody is watching the rights of the American people dwindle.
Soon it will be against the law to criticize the government.
If you can ,go back to Bush Sr. and just follow the path of rights that have been taken under the cover of security.
One party hasn't been any better than the other.
They are two heads of the same snake.
2007-07-13 13:47:30 · answer #2 · answered by Robert J W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The effort to limit time to the lower tier candidates was tried during the GOP primaries in New Hampshire in 1980. They held a televised debate and only invited George H. W. Bush and Ronald Reagan. The others protested to no avail. When the debate was ready to start, Reagan invited all the other candidates to come up on stage and said they were being treated unfairly, and George was sitting there looking foolish. This one act was genius for Reagan. He went on to win that primary, and we know the rest.
I'm not a Reagan fan but this move was beautifully played.
2007-07-13 14:21:06 · answer #3 · answered by ripbolts 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The democrats want to limit the number of candidates to promote just a few. They want there to be a large number of republicans so no one can have spotlight time, for example Ron Paul. He's not going to win the candidacy no matter what. Yet they want him there so they can use him to distract from the real "legitimate" candidates who will possibly win the candidacy. I went into the book store the other day and I went browsing through the political isle. Obama has a biography out now. Why they hell does he need a biography? So he can get more air time in case he does win the candidacy. I did not see any republican candidate's biography on the shelf.
2007-07-13 13:38:12 · answer #4 · answered by civil_av8r 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
WOW.... candidates trying to torpedo their openents...has this ever happened in american politics befor?....... Open your eyes....happens every election....when was the last time the parties allowed the green party, liberatarin party into the national debates?.....basic politics
P.S. as far as the media bias....do a quick google search on the issue and you'll find all the major news organizations reporting it, including ABC, MSNBC
2007-07-13 13:34:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Excellent question. Why ARE the democrats so desperate to stop the American people from hearing ALL points of view? If you ask me, this is very telling of what these two particular candidates are all about. WAKE UP and vote for truth!
2007-07-13 13:38:28 · answer #6 · answered by Chief Yellow Horse 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Never trust the drudge report but you are right. They've been doing that for months. It's not hard to see in their speeches.
2007-07-13 13:45:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't like any of the candidates for president - from either party.
If a republican wins, it will be more of the same b.s.
If a democrat wins, it will be more of the same whining from republicans about how stupid democrats are.
It's a lose - lose situation. Though at least a democrat president would be a change of pace.
2007-07-13 13:33:39 · answer #8 · answered by Joe M 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
You mean, politicians will do anything to get the most votes, and they want more camera time than their opponents? I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you!
I must go now and spread this news to others! (*hops on horse, kicks horse with her heal, yells, "YAA!", and gallops off into the sunset...)
2007-07-13 13:34:33 · answer #9 · answered by shelly 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They're socialist nothing new there.. Barack Obama is also a socialist at least he made it public by admitting to going to the socialist rallies.... Wouldn't vote for any of them I enjoy Freedom too much..
2007-07-13 13:39:35 · answer #10 · answered by bereal1 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋