Maybe not marshall law exactly, but under a new presidential directive, Bush can declare a national catastrophe which will him near dictatorial powers.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55824
2007-07-13 06:27:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
The real life chances of wide spread Marshal Law is slim to none. The US would have to be invaded for a presidential act of marshal law. However, if there was a terrorist act, limited Marshal law may take place by using the National Guard to control the impacted area. This type of Marshal Law could be declared by the Governor responsible for the state.
2007-07-13 06:32:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Michael H ~ if Hillary becomes President, will YOU move to France? No, because you're an American who wants what you think is best for your country, right? Get it now? If I were able to punch everyone who tells me to move to France because I'm unpatriotic for not blindly agreeing with everything the Presidents says (*continues inaudible ranting, cussing, and twitching while walking away...*)
Oh, I guess I have to answer your question instead of just ranting at others. It's tacos. The answer is tacos...
2007-07-13 06:41:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by shelly 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
it truly is what we've come to call the media-business complicated, particularly of reporting on something substantial that the individuals would be outraged via, they decide for to checklist on ridiculous issues that are overglorified cleansing soap operas. think of back. many of the main coated matters in the process the previous couple of years have been Brittany(sp?) Spears, Anna Nicole Smith(which became milked for months and months), Paris Hilton, and another non-sequitor travesty that we've crammed down our throats. that is handy, as a results of fact it serves to throw the regular public's interest to a distinctive concern. meanwhile, bypass some insane regulations and notice who notices a year later whilst that is too late. we are apprehensive approximately weapons of Mass destruction? i'm apprehensive approximately weapons of mass distraction.
2016-10-21 03:35:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
See stuff like that is just hysteria and takes away from good discussion on the site. There must be a gazillion politically based sites that you can do that kind of left handed propaganda stuff on it. Why don't you? Not everyone is a political cultist and many are still looking around for candidates or ideas that are not just someone politician's playbook.
2007-07-13 06:27:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tom W 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
How stupid and ignorant are you?
Do you even know what Marshall Law is?
Since you seem to hate this president so much, why don't you move to France under the new leadership? I think you will be much happier there.
2007-07-13 06:26:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Michael H 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
Robert, your paranoid. Perhaps you will feel more secure after the democrats hand the Islamic militants a victory.
2007-07-13 06:28:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Please stop scaring the weak little libs with such statements They believe everything they hear Don't do that to their feeble minds
2007-07-13 06:26:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Would it surprise me? No it would not.
Is it very likely? Not really, but the possibility is there.
2007-07-13 06:26:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by gotagetaweigh 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
They're acting like they already did.
2007-07-13 06:25:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋