Here is my guess on the whole thing.
The locket that Harry and Dumbeldore retrieved WAS NOT the horcrux. The liquid that Dumbeldore drank to get to it WAS. This leads to the real startling of my suspisions;
Snape will be revealed as one of the good guys.
Snape was not Voldemorts man inside Dumbeldores organization. It was the other way around. Snape was Dumbeldores man inside Voldemorts organization.
Here are the clues.
In Prisoner of Azkiban, we find that Harrys father, and his friends, were cruel to Snape. He hated them because of it. But, and here is the reason Dumbeldore trusted Snape, Lily tried to protect him.
Snape was in love with Lily.
As much as he hated James Potter for having her, he hated Voldemort more for killing her.
Dumbeldore sacrificed his own life by drinking the horcrux. His murder by Snape was pre-arrainged between them. Voldemort could never be allowed to suspect that Snape possesed the power of love.
2007-07-14 11:53:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nope. J. K. Rowling has already said so.
The horcruxes we know about:
The diary (destroyed)
The ring (destroyed)
The locket (in the Black house)
The snake (mentioned by Dumbledore)
The Hufflepuff cup (mentioned by Dumbledore)
There might be another item once owned by Ravenclaw and possibly another once owned by Gryffindor (not the sword). I am inclined to think there are just six horcruxes and another item Valdemort intended to make into a horcrux when he killed Harry. That could be either the Ravenclaw or Gryffindor item.
It may be there are fewer. We don't know how far Valdemort went before he was stopped.
2007-07-13 13:14:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by loryntoo 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, wouldn't consider her to be a horcrux. Riddle was trying to put his soul into Ginny, but he failed when Harry put the Basilsik Fang in the diary. so no, i do not think that Ginny is a Horcrux.
hope i could help,
have a nice day
2007-07-13 13:08:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hm.
I actually think he just meant that he was starting to control her, because she was figuratively "pouring her soul out" to him, in the form of a diary. I don't think that the younger Tom Riddle could make another horcrux, since he himself was only a fraction of Voldemort's soul.
But maybe that's just me :]
2007-07-13 13:06:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nick O 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
No.
JK Rowling actually answered this question herself:
JK Rowling: "Harry definitely destroyed that piece of soul, you saw it take shape, you saw it destroyed, it’s gone. And Ginny is definitely in no way possessed by Voldemort."
See the full interview here: http://www.accio-quote.org/articles/2005/0705-tlc_mugglenet-anelli-3.htm
2007-07-13 13:05:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by HP Wombat 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
good guess, maybe
but personally i dont think a horcrux will be a person( if it is maybe some one evil)
you might be right too
2007-07-13 13:06:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Someone asked JK Rowling whether Ginny was a Horcrux, and she said ‘no, and neither is Harry’. Rowling also officially stated that she in not in any way connected with Voldemort.
2007-07-13 13:05:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by girrrtacos 3
·
0⤊
5⤋
I think Harry is a horcrux or maybe Neville.
2007-07-13 13:08:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by tigerlily23 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
i think it is a possibilty, but i also think that a spell needs to be cast for the actual soul to permently stay in the body and become a horcrux. does this make sence? i dunno- but 7 days left!!!
2007-07-13 13:05:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Padfoot 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
horcruxes:
the snake-alive
the basalisk-dead
his ring-i think dumbledore got it
the cup of hufflpuff or something of hufflepuff-
something of ravenclaw-
voldemort himself-
the diary-destroyed
2007-07-13 13:23:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Vi 4
·
1⤊
0⤋