At a morning news conference where he released a mixed progress report on his troop buildup, Mr. Bush repeatedly invoked the threat of Al Qaeda as a reason to stick with his strategy, saying the group he referred to as Al Qaeda in Iraq “has sworn allegiance to Osama bin Laden.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/13/washington/13policy.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin
"Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia did not exist before the Sept. 11 attacks. The Sunni group thrived as a magnet for recruiting and a force for violence largely because of the American invasion of Iraq"
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/13/world/middleeast/13qaeda.html?th&emc=th
So let me get this straight - we know Al Qaeda didn't exist in Iraq before 9/11 (contrary to what Bush has claimed). Now because of the Iraq War, not only are they in Iraq, but have claimed allegiance to bin Laden, who Bush failed to catch because he sent the troops to Iraq? This is the justification for staying in Iraq?
Biggest irony ever?
2007-07-13
05:03:52
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Dana1981
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics