Apparently the BBC played it backwards to make it seem that the Queen stormed out of a portrait painting.
I was wondering how they did that.
2007-07-13 05:00:25 · 8 answers · asked by James T 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
They never played it backwards they just simply edited it. Not hard to do with their expertise.
2007-07-13 05:06:54 · answer #1 · answered by scorpionbabe32 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Strictly, that's not true. An external production agency made the documenary and put the video together on behalf of the BBC and then passed onto the BBC. The BBC did not know it was the incorrect sequence until it had come to the attention of the palace.
Why can't people just accept things they way they happen instead of looking for something, some theory or conspiracy or corruption that simply isn't there?
I don't accept that the BBC did this to be malicious or on prupose. How stupid would they be to do that, they know palace officials are going to see it and wouldn't want to rock the boat after the tele-scandals with Blue Peter recently.
A mini storm in a tea cup I think.
2007-07-15 13:18:32 · answer #2 · answered by Ms Eddy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the production team editted the film in the wrong order. It isn't backwards. Can you get your head around that one?
2007-07-13 12:09:29 · answer #3 · answered by lili4ndevil 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thought I saw that link somewhere. I'll come back in a few minutes with the link...
2007-07-13 12:13:55 · answer #4 · answered by FutureSEAL 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Queen did not flounce off. In honesty I would not blame her if she had
2007-07-13 12:09:23 · answer #5 · answered by Scouse 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
careful about the QUEEN !Disaster may reach you any time and remember our queen is above the law!
2007-07-13 12:11:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
go into BBC archives.
2007-07-13 22:24:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i haven't given it a thought/she's entitled to loose it if she wants to
2007-07-16 16:26:22 · answer #8 · answered by srracvuee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋