much like people are under the illusion that Saddam would not allow inspectors into the country I am sure it will be said that Iran would not allow inspectors in as well.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070713/ap_on_re_mi_ea/nuclear_agency_iran
2007-07-13 04:03:08 · 13 answers · asked by JF 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
As long as Iran allows UN inspectors to inspect there will be no need to bomb Iran. Should they not comply then they deserve to be bombed. Unless of course, you are from the school of thought that Iran would "never" use a nuclear device on the US or any of it's allies. If that is the case then why don't we just give everyone a nuclear bomb and we no longer have to inspect, we then would no everyone has the bomb but they wouldn't "dare" use it, unless of course they are terrorist.
2007-07-13 04:11:37 · answer #1 · answered by grinslinger 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If and when he does and if and when Iran lets the inspectors in, I'll remember the article.
2007-07-13 11:11:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The UN said Saddam would not allow inspectors, not Bush.
Those were UN sanctions he broke not Bush's.
If you are trying to draw a parallel, you missed the point.
But the again, perhaps you should read what BOTH sides have to say about Iran.
2007-07-13 11:08:46 · answer #3 · answered by Ken C 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Your blind hatred for Bush has blinded you from the truth as well. Show me one article where President Bush or his administration has called for attacks on Iran.
~chirp~
~chirp~
RIGHT! He hasn't.
On the other hand, the DEMS have called for it.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/10/ftn/main2908476.shtml
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2007/030707Lieberman.htm
And, agreeing to and actually allowing are two different things. I hope you remember that Saddam AGREED as well, then he hindered their progress, denied access to secret facilities and even kicked them out of his country. Also, look at North Korea. They agreed to dismantle their nukes. Has it happened yet? No.
I hope Iran does start cooperating. I doubt they will.
2007-07-13 11:11:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Oh goody another conspiracy theory from the best that Mikey Moore and Al Gore have to offer
2007-07-13 11:12:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush will never bomb Iran.. he will have a full scale revolt on his hands if he does. People are barely putting up with him now.. if he thinks he can send even more of our young people to die.. he is wrong.
2007-07-13 11:11:06 · answer #6 · answered by Debra H 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
When are we going to bomb Iran? Has congress voted on this? Your question shows the world that we are still working the diplomatic route as we have for years, just as we said we were going to do.
2007-07-13 11:08:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I don't think Bush is going to be the one to hit Iran. If they get close to a nuke, Israel will do it.
2007-07-13 11:09:07 · answer #8 · answered by booman17 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Iran has agreed to inspections. see yahoo news. Bush and republicans are not smart enough to see past illusions.. They never were smart enough.
2007-07-13 11:09:45 · answer #9 · answered by jack09 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I will - but the cons won't. They'll call it media bias, or a ruse by Iran, or blame it on satan or liberals or something.
2007-07-13 11:16:53 · answer #10 · answered by ArgleBargleWoogleBoo 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋