English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What are you going to do Monkey Man when the rest of the crap you and your staff has dished out over the last 6 years goes through the test of hearings and trials?

2007-07-13 03:04:32 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

12 answers

Who disclosed the identity of the CIA agent?
GWB: "There is a current serious investigation into that matter, so I can not comment on it"

Now that the investigation is finished, what do you Mr. president have to say about it?
"The issue has run its course and we must move on".

As Joe Conason wrote: "For four years, every reporter who asked the president or his press secretaries any question about the Wilson matter has received essentially the same non-responsive response: The president and the White House staff could not talk about the matter so long as the special counsel was actively pursuing the case. That tired excuse no longer works.

Now that the leak prosecution has ended with Bush's silencing of Libby -- the only potential stool pigeon who could implicate him and Vice President Cheney in the vicious and unpatriotic "outing" of Valerie Plame Wilson -- he says instead that it is time to move on. Yet all of the lingering questions still require real answers."

2007-07-18 08:51:53 · answer #1 · answered by johnfarber2000 6 · 2 0

The problem with Bush and his vice p., was they made sure that all their staff were yes people and that none of them ever questioned their decisions. That's why Colin Powell left. He knew if he stayed he would end up in quick sand with the rest of them. The last thing any president and v.p. needs is a group of parrots around them repeating everything they say to keep their jobs. And the ones out in the field got the Axe when they questioned Bush and Dick's decisions. The White House has too many puppets and parrots and not enough free thinkers to get together and think things through BEFORE any critical decisions are initiated. That in a nut shell is why we are in Iraqi now and Bush is saying We are winning. And if we don't win, he will blame it on Congress. Bush is not man enough to take any blame himself.

2007-07-20 19:16:12 · answer #2 · answered by Jackolantern 7 · 3 0

I have never heard him called MM but now that you mention it that is very fitting for someone with such little intellect that he thinks he can just sweep this under the oval office carpet. When I was in Italy the called him "the cowboy" because he liked to come in guns blazing like some idiot in a spaghetti western regardless of the consequences. That was over four years ago and I wasn't sure it was deserved, I'm sure now and then some. We all have our problems with politicians, every country has their necessary vermin out there. I just wonder how the American people thought it would be good idea to elect Bush when his brother was governor of Florida and his father had been president too. It sounded like a monarchy to me and I would have no part of that. Now, here we are, we everything going to s--- and everyone pointing a finger at everyone else. Nice going!

2007-07-13 10:56:37 · answer #3 · answered by ZenWoman 4 · 7 0

The insolence and condescension of those that have led a life of privilege and power is without end. Bush thinks that the American people are as stupid as he and will buy such a ignorant delaying and dismissing tactic as this.

Sad truth is he might be right. Bush has been given, not worked for, everything he has. From his "gentleman's "C's" at ivy league schools to his avoidance of personal risk during wartime, to America itself.

What happened to having presidents that were self made hardworking honest men instead of pure breed elitist deceitful cons in the White House?

What a sad state of affairs. We might as well live under one of those undemocratic middle eastern governments--those governments also have abysmally low levels of popular support for their governments policies and equally non-responsive heads of state to what the people want.

70% of the public now wants us out of Iraq. Bush doesnt care. thats not democracy.

2007-07-13 10:30:13 · answer #4 · answered by Free Radical 5 · 8 2

Hopefully he and his conspirators will be held accountable after they leave office. Maybe the next President upon inauguration will name bush jr and dicky enemy combatants and send them to gitmo.

2007-07-20 15:57:03 · answer #5 · answered by Follow the money 7 · 2 0

personally I like when the senate does all useless hearings. When they do that they don't try to pass laws that give away the United States.

2007-07-19 19:28:43 · answer #6 · answered by dianer 5 · 0 1

Yes, yes, my staff lied, now its time to get over it and move on. ... Right?

And I am NOT going to allow any of them to tell you why and how they lied, because I am the President, right?

If Bill Clinton lied about a BJ, we can lie about anything, right?

Show some respect, after all, I am the PRESIDENT, right?

Come January 2009, please!

2007-07-13 10:25:40 · answer #7 · answered by Tokoloshimani 5 · 7 3

You know it. Nothing to see here, just keep moving. If only life worked that way. It has for MM up till now. What's to make him think anythings changed and he's going to suddenly be held responsible? He's never been held responsible for anything in his charmed little life.

2007-07-13 10:14:07 · answer #8 · answered by pm 5 · 13 2

Well I think Bush is 100% correct......
we should forget about all of it because it's in the past...and we should just move on with more important matters....like impeachment.

2007-07-13 10:14:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 12 2

I didn't think my estimation of the overbred chump could get any lower. Then he served up that turd.

2007-07-13 10:15:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 11 2

fedest.com, questions and answers