2007-07-13 03:01:03 · 18 answers · asked by Nick 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
Yes. Marriage has nothing to do with paternity. If it is his biologically child, he is legally responsible to help financially support the child. Whether or not the father is a part of the child's life.
2007-07-13 03:05:43 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
you are able to prepare for custody yet in ninety 9.9 % of situations they are going to area with the mummy. If the mummy is now residing with yet another guy than which will oftentimes count selection in her favour too through fact the youngster is being reported in a good enjoyed ones. regardless of the undeniable fact that the two considered one of you employing for finished custody does not be in the youngster's best hobbies, she ought to have universal get admission to to the two mother and father. you have rights to work out her and in case you won't be able to agree an amicable answer together with her mom or are being denied visitation then you rather ought to coach for visitation rights. you at the instant are not paying upkeep on your ex spouse, you're paying funds on your newborn which you have a liability to do no count what the mothers circumstances are, that's beside the point. uncertain what alimony is ? yet as quickly as divorced you have not any legal economic liability to her in any respect, purely on your newborn.
2016-12-14 07:36:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She can claim child support if the father is proven to be the father through DNA.
2007-07-13 03:04:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hell yeah, if you want to fight it, she will just have you served to take a dna, if indeed you are the father. Then if you don't pay, you go to prison after awhile. It takes two to make a baby, and pretty much two to raise them. It shouldn't have to be court ordered, men should care about there children, I just don't understand people that turn there backs on there kids. If i was you I personally would want to know, if I was the father.
2007-07-13 03:18:42 · answer #4 · answered by grizzlybearthunderfoot 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, a father still has financial responsibility for the child, regardless of his relationship with the mother.
2007-07-13 03:03:59 · answer #5 · answered by smartsassysabrina 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
you don't have to be married to pay child support. If you are not in a relationship with her anymore you are still suppose to pay. Especially if you want to be a part of the kids life. If you are together then you are already providing support.
2007-07-13 03:05:07 · answer #6 · answered by boston_based_guy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's really sad that the woman has to claim for that. Do you expect her to be responsible for the child all by herself??
2007-07-13 03:08:27 · answer #7 · answered by ruebezahl2001 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depending on the laws of individual states, and, too, if the male's name is on the baby's birth certificate, listing him as the legal father, I think she can.
2007-07-13 03:06:01 · answer #8 · answered by bitadkins 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think, by laws, no, she cannot demand it. But if the father of the child is responsible enough and can support the kid, they why not ask him, maybe he'll support the child.
2007-07-13 03:07:08 · answer #9 · answered by libertine 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the parent who has legal custody should be receiving child support.
2007-07-13 03:17:08 · answer #10 · answered by hellzfirex 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋