There is some evidence that people who do not have a partner/spouse or a close person to be with, including the sexual intercourse, tend to concentrate more on the abovementioned factors to outbalance the spiritual disharmony. Aesthetic details, quality food, music, physical activity activate the senses (thus various buds/receptors) which results into inner satisfaction and fullness. Is that better than sex?
What do you reckon?
2007-07-13 02:30:29 · 2 answers · asked by perspiring_angel 1 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
No that is absolutely wrong, but the fact is that you are talking about 2 different things. One is a physical thing and the other is not, do these things substitute for the regular use of going to the bathroom or elimination another physical body function? However, being with someone does not mean that you have to have sex with them, a relationship is not built on sex, but an orgasm is something that people need if they give that to themself or someone else gives that to them. You can have a relationship and it be a romantic one without it being sexual and you can have a sexual relationship and that be all that it is.
2007-07-13 02:40:26 · answer #1 · answered by Friend 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Food, sleep and sexual urge are
built into the genes of all living beings.
Their requirements act through
sub-conscious mind. Nothing can
replace them unless a person wants
to become a hermit and celibate.
2007-07-13 03:33:47 · answer #2 · answered by d_r_siva 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋