Here' the question :
After the war, Iraq fell into anarchy, with extremists stirring up trouble, Shiites and Sunnis killing each other.
While Saddam was in charge - EVEN WHILE THE COUNTRY WAS SUFFERING FROM A 10 YEAR SANCTION - none of this occured.
Neither Syria nor Iran dared send suicide bombers in to disrupt his country.
Saddam was a bastard, to be sure, but Iraq is a country that needs bastards in charge, or else they would face the problems today. America simply did not take into account anything like that.
My question : Should we have reinstated Saddam as a puppet dictator under U.S. control, along with the former Iraqi army, in order to keep peace in Iraq?
As for the WMD crap, that's just it - crap.
As for Israel's security - SCREW THE JEWS.
2007-07-12
20:44:03
·
5 answers
·
asked by
weeab002
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Apparently the words "puppet under US control" seems to fly right past everybody.
2007-07-12
20:52:14 ·
update #1
billybuysky :
Lol. 'seen the light'. Yeah, you can 'see the light' in ground zero of a suicide bombing all right.
2007-07-12
20:54:14 ·
update #2
brkshandilya :
Those are very good points - and Iraq can stabilize, but only if American troops were committed to stay for longer periods.
Unfortunately, they are pulling out early next year, and Islamic hardliners seem to be gaining the upper hand in control.
2007-07-12
21:25:46 ·
update #3