Anyone notice how often GOPers deny deny deny something only to be proven wrong?

Question

When they start apologizing for all the stances they took, that have been undeniably proven wrong?

from the hunt for wmd, to no there is no torturing going on, to no there is no warrantless surveillance going on, to no CIA name was not leaked on purpose, to tax cuts did not gush no tax revenues, etc..etc...etc.....

My lord.......come on now people.....you see what I am saying??

Answer 1

Or Clinton's regime saying it was worth it to kill 567,000 Iraqi children 5 years old and younger.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lK_QshS2EW8

This was one of the main reasons Bin Laden stated why he attacked on 9/11.

Blow-back: Both Republicans and Democrats need to read about it and understand it before starting yet another bogus war which will make us even more unsafe.

Answer 2

They still won't admit there were no WMD's even though Bush has say's there weren't, and we know there were none, Many on here are still claiming Iraq had something to with 9/11 another lie Bush claimed he never made! Even Bush admited Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjFrezxIMAQ

America : One Nation, Under Surveillance

Answer 3

to err is human

I am almost 50, and have yet to see any administration that did any different. The only difference is the very great extent to which this administration keeps denying reality in the face of severe damage being done to this country by such wrong policies.

Answer 4

i did not inhale, i did not have sex with that woman, depends on what the definition of "is" is, 911 was an inside job, vast right wing conspiracy, there is no liberal bias in the media,i suppoert the military, i support out roops, bill clinton created millions of jobs, etc.etc.etc.

Answer 5

You choose to look at the world from a different angle.

Answer 6

Do you notice how often the Democrats have no problem when one of theor own commits crimes like the Clintons, Ted Kennedy, and so many others buthey because they are Democrats that makes them so holy.

By the way the Democrats said Saddam had WMDs, so if Bush really did lie then so did all these guys who made all these statements:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop
weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom
line."
President Bill Clinton. Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want
to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction
program."
President Bill Clinton. Feb. 17, 1998.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to
use force – if necessary – to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a
deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave
threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry, D-MA. Oct. 2002.

"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly
grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And
now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his
consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. So the threat of Saddam
Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real."
Sen. John F. Kerry, D-MA. Jan. 23, 2003.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-MA. Sept. 27, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that
Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock,
his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given
aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al-Qaeda members ... It is
clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase
his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to
develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY. Oct 10, 2002.

We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the
production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Bob Graham, D-FL. Dec. 8, 2002.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal
here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear,
chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security
threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Clinton's Secretary of State.
Feb 18, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright. Nov. 10, 1999.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since
1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser. Feb,18, 1998.

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.
Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air
and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat
posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John
Kerry, and others. Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has
made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Dec. 16, 1998.

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam
continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a
licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the
United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, signed by Sen. Bob Graham, D-FL, and others. Dec, 5,
2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to
the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the
United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of
delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin, D-MI. Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons
throughout his country."
Vice President Al Gore. Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter
and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Vice President Al Gore. Sept. 23, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident
that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons,
and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and
biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is
seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd, D-WV. Oct. 3, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to
develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next
five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the
progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-WV. Oct 10, 2002.

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every
significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused
to do"
Rep. Henry Waxman, D-CA. Oct. 10, 2002.