I choose to be normal like you!
2007-07-12 17:38:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥♥Pro♥♥ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not having feet. You can do way more things with your hands than your feet.
2007-07-12 17:41:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by DRegan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Feet.
2007-07-12 17:40:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Meeya 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think not having feet - you can always get around in a wheelchair, but hands are used for pretty much everything you do day to day. I couldn't imagine having someone to do every basic thing for me if I didn't have hands.
And I respect those people who, through either and accident or quirk of nature, have one or no hands. They have had to adapt themselves to life without, and I appreciate what I have so much more......mind you, those without feet are in my thoughts too, because that couldn't be easy either......
2007-07-12 17:41:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by mamabear_45 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is there another choice? I need my feet and hands but if I have to choose I guess I'd loose my feet cause I can't answer P&S with my toes, it would take all night with toes...
2007-07-12 17:41:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lookin 4 ants 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would choose not having my hands and having my feet.
2007-07-12 17:39:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by _imnoripoff_ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would choose to not have feet. Because if I lost my feet then I could just have wheeles installed and screw walking all together.
2007-07-12 17:43:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Manx 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not having Hands...I can live w/o my feet.
2007-07-12 17:41:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd choose not having feet.
2007-07-12 17:47:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No feet. I could use a wheel chair but I could still do things with my hands.
2007-07-12 17:40:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by edtkkfif 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
In theory, I'd choose to keep my feet because I love shoes
I'd rather keep both though.
2007-07-12 17:40:01
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋