SMOKE MUCH?!! Tyranny from Saddam!!!! You and other %29 retards make me laugh so hard!
You people don't even realize, how you deepen yourselves in sh*** more than you already are! by come up with these kind of nonsense! it's like a last breath or LAST ACT OF DESPERATION!!
You and your kind are doing one thing perfectly right, and that's copying from your clown king. Like bushy, your pathetic, loser leader, tell a lie or some sort of garbage, when there's nothing to say or hang on to!
2007-07-13 05:09:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Polls. Don't you love them? Especially exit polls.
For example, Joe Lieberman was thrown under the bus after his Iraq fact finding visit when he returned and dared to say there was indeed progress being made. The subsequent polls had this guy pretty much politically washed up - he ran on the independent ticket and crushed his opponents. Could it be that the polls really didn't represent the voters? In this case, the polls provided absolutely bogus results. Remember the exit polls during Bush / Gore? Yeah, those were right on the money, too.
I strongly suspect that Bush and his steadfast and resolve in trying to eradicate the Islamic terrorists has a lot more supporters than the media or the polls would want you to think.
2007-07-12 15:27:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
First if i'm a Bush hater you're a Bush kiss a$$. Bush has as lots accountability for the economic equipment, or extra advantageous than any President going back to Carter. His politics and taxation rules, exceeded with the aid of a conservative congress, helped to create this economic meltdown. Banks have a lot of fault, we agree. issues hit the fan way previously 2006, you're a conservative and your question is in protection of Bush. whilst we had a democrat congress maximum persons became into very slender and Bush had the veto, examine YOUR American historic previous. The conflict in Iraq became into according to lies, way high priced and placed usa in economic dire straits dude. That unlawful conflict became right into a catalyst to the devaluation of the US dollar, a burden on people who served to take care of a lie. Iraq had no longer something to do with 911, so your budding democracy is incomprehensible. I hate Bush because of the fact of his politics and his administration, what he did became into set our united states of america backwards. He has cowards such as you afraid of their own shadows protecting him on Iraq. Did those WMDS ever get stumbled on? advance up, Bush would be our united states of america's absolute worst president, bar none. We kicked your ilk to the size back in 2008, you at the instant are moot.
2016-10-01 12:06:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by barrantes 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are right about one thing, this isn't a video game, and YOUR PRESIDENT is treating it like it is one! These are precious lives he is screwing with (our Valued American Soldiers), and he is using them as a video game. Meanwhile, nothing has STILL been proven that Saddam was part of 9/11, and if you remember, THAT WAS THE F-ING REASON WHY WE SUPPOSEDLY WENT INTO IRAQ IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!
Time has already been told with Iraq. It has been told IT IS NOT WORKING, and your president did not have an ALTERNATE PLAN. All he has shown was "group think" in his administration (the people under him agreeing on everything he does without questioning him) and it has cost our country to have LESS RESPECT THAN CLINTON'S ADULTERY SCANDAL!
Give it up, cause more and more people aren't buying into it anymore.
2007-07-12 15:22:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
is this a question? the press asked a lot of smart questions: what was the connection between Iraq and Al Quaeda, why didn't we fight Al Quaeda in Afghanistan first befroe we went into the adventure in Iraq etc. To set the records straight: There wasn't any Al Quaeda in Iraq, and Iraq will never be a democracy, because they're not ready for it have never been a unified country (unless under oppressive rulers). This is a mess and you know it.
2007-07-12 15:11:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by innocentANDpc 2
·
5⤊
1⤋
actually to be a "legitimate" poll, there has to be at least 1000 people polled. Usually the number polled is around 1003. The only time I quote polls is when I'm throwing it in the face of a poll quoter. They are ridiculous, and do not represent the majority of the people in this country. Elections are the only thing that do.
2007-07-12 15:09:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Tyrany of Sadam? 70,000 civilians dead, mission accomplished, the surge has had the most deadly affect on the troops since the war has started and news reports now confirm Al Qaeda is now stronger than they were before the war began
2007-07-12 15:09:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
If they can't answer a questionthat has nt happened yet, then why does the Bush administration act like they are getting their advice from a psychic hotline??
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070712/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush
Polls are notoriously unreliable, but when you poll 1000 people it is definitely a lot more reliable than when Bush says..."the American people want...blah blah blah" when the information he is relying on is his own wants, and those of Rove.
2007-07-12 15:12:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
the people have voted ,bush now must show his dignity as he steps down next year.its been a real poll buster that's for sure.and the nation is ready for a change.bush will have a hero's farewell like rummy did.chow from party headquarters
2007-07-12 15:15:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
What the heck are you smoking.....Sound a tad rattled..you do ! Could you at least be a bit more coherent !!?
Talk about dumb ! bush fits right into that category...
Frankly I wasn't even focusing on the press because I couldn't stand watching ...bush... for 30 seconds....THE WORST pREDIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY
2007-07-12 15:19:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by krissyderic 7
·
2⤊
1⤋