It's all the same. I think If you're going to be nervous it could be one person there, and you'll be just as nervous as if it were 1000. I really don't think it matters.
2007-07-12 13:21:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥ justbnme ♥ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
30
2007-07-12 20:25:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by *gossip*fan* 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
30
2007-07-12 20:22:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by ♥mikayla 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
30 ppl... cuz the less ppl u have listening to u won't see as many facial expressions, like i can't say a speech in front of 2 ppl but i can say it in front of 30 so the more the better
2007-07-12 20:27:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
30 definitely. for some reason when there is a big crowd it's no big deal. I guess it's just a mass, a blob of people. however in front of 30 people you can see facial expression, boredom, etc
2007-07-12 20:22:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jessica 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
3000. there's so many more people to embarrass yourself in front of... also, the group of 30 will probably be more sympathetic if you make a mistake since the speech would be more intimate...
2007-07-12 20:24:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cliff 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely. The larger the crowd,the easier it is to relate to it as one person. You can even converse with a large audience. It's one entity. Thirty people are thirty individuals,and that's a very uptight situation for the speaker.
An excellent question.
2007-07-12 20:23:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Galahad 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
30 people scare me more that 3,000. It's more personal with that few people.
2007-07-12 20:21:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by sarge 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
30 People because there isn't that many and they are all looking at you. 3,000 . I doubt they will all be listening and looking at you..
2007-07-12 20:22:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by StarShine G 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
for me, definitely 3000...i'm a teacher, so i'm used to speaking in front of 30... :)
2007-07-12 20:21:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by socalteacher 2
·
1⤊
0⤋