English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What is the difference between "terrorists" in Iraq and the Vietcong in Vietnam? How does our military fight an enemy we can't find or identify?

2007-07-12 13:10:35 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

The NVA wore uniforms, not the viet cong.

2007-07-12 13:26:56 · update #1

7 answers

We leave and let them figure it out. Worked in Vietnam.

2007-07-12 13:19:09 · answer #1 · answered by Daniel A 2 · 1 0

The vietcong wore uniforms. Just because it's harder now doesn't mean we shouldn't defend a people that will get utterly slaughered if we just leave (like what happened in Vietnam). Three million people were killed by the communists when we left southeast asia. There was noone there to save them. Why would anyone want a repeat of that?

2007-07-12 20:18:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They do it every day.

These sick monsters hide behind children and women, hide in mosques and schools. It is hard. But there is always scum. Always will be.

How? The people of Iraq and now other Islamic nations are leaving or better, speaking up. They are no longer silent.

Look at the events in Lebanon. They themselves are going after the terrorists!

It's WORKING!

There'll always be terrorists, but Islamic people will no longer tolerate it, nor be silenced by it.

Why, you want to abandon them now? Hand it back to the terrorists?

Because we can't win, we should give in?

Do you do the same with any cancer? Might come back, so might as well give in and die, right?

2007-07-12 20:16:20 · answer #3 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 1 0

You must be an insurgent sense they are the ones who are murdering the innocent people in Iraq. Too bad you didn't join the military because then you'd see who was and who wasn't killing the innocent people of Iraq. If you're not one of the insurgents, you might want to go join up with them because you both think alike.

2007-07-12 20:17:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

"WE" aren't killing them it is the scum of AQ and the insurgence that are killing them. I still think we should not have gone in, but if we were, that whole country should have been nothing but a burnt out cinder before the first US soldier crossed into the country.

2007-07-12 20:22:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We get the muslim extremists and kill them. That would save all the Innocent Iraqis that they are killing.

2007-07-12 20:14:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I wish Democrats would get a clue.

2007-07-12 20:17:47 · answer #7 · answered by GoGo Girls 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers