Tough question on contrasting two subjects.?

Question

how would I contrast photosynthesis and respiration of a plant? -- Also, how do plants respirate over night when everything is sleeping?

... summer school. I hate it. :(

... summer classes. not fun. :(

Answer 1

Contrast means to tell how they are different. Compare means to tell how they are alike.

Contrasting:
Photosynthesis
1. Uses light energy to make the energy-storing molecule called glucose. Only happens in the light.
2. Needs carbon dioxide and water.
3. Produces glucose and oxygen.
4. Happens in the chloroplasts of the cells.

Respiration
1. Breaks molecules of glucose to release energy for the plant to use. Happens all the time because plant cells need energy all the time. (Some people think that it just happens at night, but if you think about it, that's not the only time the cells are needing energy to make proteins, transport materials, and so on.)
2. Needs glucose and oxygen to work.
3. Produces carbon dioxide and water.
4. Happens in the mitochondria of the cells.

The second part of your question ... There's no reason for plants to not carry on respiration during the night. Respiration in this case does not refer to breathing. It's the breaking down of glucose to get energy to use. We usually use the word respiration to talk about breathing in and breathing out - our lungs are part of our respiratory system. But "cellular respiration" is that glucose-breaking process. All cells in every kind of living thing carry on that kind of respiration. Even bacteria, molds, algae, paramecia, oak trees, and dogs.

Answer 2

I'm no expert on photosynthesis, but I can answer your second question.

First, sleeping animals still emit carbon dioxide. They just emit more when they're awake. Second, even if animals did not breathe when they were asleep, there is enough carbon dioxide generated in the daytime that plants would have plenty to use for respiration during the night. They would only run out if all animals stopped breathing for several months or years.

Answer 3

libertarianism is, generally conversing, the view that people are unfastened prepared brokers with ethical duty, despite the fact that it takes on a particular meaning in political factors the place it represents a desire for minimalist governments, unfastened marketplace economics & extreme rights to sources. Robert Nozick replaced into between the 1st valid proponents, Anarchy, State & utopia replaced right into a e book he wrote that replaced into very extensive-unfold. it is all insane of course, in spite of the undeniable fact that it has grow to be worryingly extensive-unfold. compatibilism is, in this discourse around freedom/unfastened will and so on. the thought that we can stay in a deterministic universe yet nonetheless exercising unfastened will with the aid of some mechanism of spontaneity that's the two God-given or derived via another mechanism. normally people say (despite the fact that under no circumstances so bluntly) the sensation of being unfastened on your selections and words, the adventure of residing as though one is unfastened, is adequate reason to think of that we are, for all intents and applications, unfastened. There are countless varieties, Kant is meant to be one, it is been 4 years on account that I studied this so memory is hazy. you're able to desire to income and assessment them with the aid of determinism- if determinism is actual, then libertarianism (interior the non-political experience) is fake. If compatibilism is actual, it purports that determinism is actual and a few function of libertarianism is actual besides. If determinism is actual then compatibilism and libertarianism are fake. As I see it, you would be a libertarian (and be incorrect) or a determinist (and be top). the assumption of the two being properly matched looks absurd to me. We do, in spite of the undeniable fact that, stay in a existence-style the place the purported certainty of unfastened will, and freedom extra generally, has been so deeply ingrained that folk locate it very no longer undemanding to think of in any different case (determinism win!) - don't be tricked, it is purely a function of a complicated comprehension factor of existence that we've come to call 'human'.

Answer 4

yea i agree