English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

This Democrat says...none of the above.

The Democratic Party is in trouble as far as the 2008 Presidential election if they do not come up with a much better candidate than the ones running now.

With what the Democratic Party has up right now...I see the next President being a Republican.

Obama is OK but lets get real...The Country is still not ready to elect an African American as President plus he does not have enough experience for the job.

I really don't care what race they are...as long as they can do the job but lets face facts...an African American still cannot be elected President in this Country mainly because of the racial divides that still exist in this Country...especially in the South.

2007-07-12 11:31:05 · answer #1 · answered by MSJP 4 · 0 0

I used to be a rabid Republican, but my views have very much shifted to middle-of-the-road and I'm so sick of the entire current Republican regime that I'm becoming a Democrat.
I'll vote for whichever of the two of Edwards and Obama is most likely to beat Hillary. The reason I say that is not that I hate Hillary's positions (although I used to) but rather that Hillary is just like Bush. Really.......
Both are arrogant.
Both are incapable of shifting course when common sense dictates it.
Neither is capable of admitting or acknowledging they are wrong.
Neither one listens to sound advice from others.
I don't want another administration of Bushlike thinking and I'll vote for anyone that's most likely to beat Hillary.

2007-07-12 11:21:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Edwards

2007-07-12 11:15:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Edwards. He targets to freshen up the well-being care industry, particularly of allowing it to become exported as is now the case. He additionally targets to make the rustic thoroughly power self sufficient, and recognizes that corn ethanol is a internet power loser. different factors are extra effective, and don't have a background of inflicting leukemia or maximum cancers, like petrofuels and nuclear power. mutually as i think he will draw down the troops interior the middle east, i think of actuality trumps wish or rhetoric, and the rustic will proceed to have a presence in Iraq and the middle east, even nevertheless a miles less confrontational. relating to well-being care and power, I easily have leukemia as a results of fact i became raised interior the oilpatch and recognize very lots with regards to the failings of the U. S. scientific equipment, and notice the extra effective effects in Canada and northerly Europe.

2016-10-21 01:12:18 · answer #4 · answered by teters 4 · 0 0

I am an independent, but can vote in the Dem primary

undecided between Obama and Hillary

2007-07-12 11:12:03 · answer #5 · answered by anonacoup 7 · 0 2

Obama

2007-07-12 11:17:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I'm in an open-primary state, and am still debating whether to sabotage the democrat or republican primary.

If Democrat, well, Biden at least has a plan for dealing with Iraq...

2007-07-12 11:12:59 · answer #7 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 2 1

I'll be voting for Sen. Hillary Clinton.

2007-07-12 11:29:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

The only Dem I'd vote for is Kucinich.

2007-07-12 11:15:27 · answer #9 · answered by craspy 2 · 0 1

I am going with experience, Clinton in 08'

2007-07-12 11:14:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers