Angry residents of the Amin district — many of them Shiites who fled to Baghdad from Baqouba, where U.S. troops are waging an offensive against insurgents — accused U.S. helicopters of striking buildings during the fight with gunmen and killing civilians. The U.S. military did not immediately comment on the fighting.
Among the dead were at least one woman and two children
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070712/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq
2007-07-12
11:03:14
·
15 answers
·
asked by
bbbbriggs04
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
women and children are the face of terrorism? your sick
2007-07-12
11:06:40 ·
update #1
so because people hide behind women and children we should keep firing on them? The police can't then why should our soldiers be able to.
2007-07-12
11:08:24 ·
update #2
so if a guy comes in your house with a gun, you would be ok with the police opening fire randomly on your home. You people disgust me. Iraqis are people too. Isn't that why we are supposedly over there protecting them?
2007-07-12
11:09:54 ·
update #3
wow mckenzie chill out. I am just suggesting if we are gonna fight so called terrorist, shouldn't we make sure we aren't killing innocent women and children.
2007-07-12
11:14:43 ·
update #4
your a psycho
2007-07-12
11:15:43 ·
update #5
No, those are the faces of the victims of terrorism.
2007-07-12 11:06:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
If you are so interested in protecting the women and children who are brought up to hate us than go right ahead. Most of those women and children are the ones that help the terrorists in many different ways. They do not have to be the "trigger person", but they can provide them shelter, feed them and protect them from the troops who are trying to find them. There have also been some reports that say that some women have become suicide boomers. Would you protect that woman as well?
2007-07-12 11:26:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Amanda K 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
you could not attack human beings of their very own international places, with out provocation, on the pretext of 'terrorism' because of the fact it won't paintings and incredibly is in straightforward terms a lie. for each act that has been defined as 'terrorism' in a political experience, a authentic crime has been committed in a civil experience. as a result, the police paintings, detective paintings and community paintings that we use to guard ourselves and shelter ourselves against crime is the terrific and extensive-unfold protection against so-referred to as 'terrorism' in all situations. This became not used interior the case of the 9/11 tragedies. nicely suited police recommendations, gathering of knowledge, and detective paintings foremost to indictments and convictions weren't observed, because of the fact it became referred to as 'terrorism' so there isn't any concrete actuality base, no person apprehended and extra to justice. this is thoroughly against our rules and criminal justice device. Our device of rules must be relied upon to paintings and it could shelter us from people who could terrorize us. for occasion, why did not NORAD or any of our different defenses paintings that day? There are actually not any stable excuses, and the persons responsible ought to have been fired, jailed, convicted and fined, at minimum. Terrorism isn't any excuse for leaving the full u . s . a . susceptible. We pay our taxes and have self belief in those human beings--they could desire to have been held responsible.
2017-01-02 09:53:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The people that are sick are the ones hiding behind the women and children. Just to show you how sick of a society we are dealing with, look how young they train their children to use weapons, and there are many occasions where women and children are suicide bombers. We need to change the government over there just to protect future generations of children from similar fates. These people blow up bombs randomly killing there own women and children in masses...but we are the ones that are sick...I feel sorry if our country ends up being led with people that have your anti-american rhetoric as their platform..i.e. Hitlery..and barrack obama!!!
2007-07-12 11:15:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by jbbrant1 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Many Americans cannot distinguish between terrorists and innocent civilians. This is the mindset:
Raghead = terrorist or terrorist sympathizer
The 'ragheads' are just taking the place of 'subhuman coloreds and injuns' from America's past.
Pathetic.
Some things will never change.
Add'l : There were ZERO terrorists in Iraq prior to Shock and Awe. The fact that people can justify the deaths of Iraqi civilians is beyond me. Weren't we 'saving them' from Sadaam?
Add'l2 : THE SUICIDE BOMBERS ARE MAINLY SAUDIS.
2007-07-12 11:20:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
You've had your head in the sand, son.
Repeated findings of these monsters have them hiding in mosques, surrounding themselves with children and women as hostages, hiding in schools.
These are the "brave" freedom fighters of Islam, hiding behind women's skirts and holding up children as shields.
And you support it.
These are scum. And you support them.
You don't keep good company.
It is the face of terrorism's victims. You're all for letting terrorists have what they want. Give in. If they hold a hostage, back up, let them take more.
That's sick.
You've chosen sides in WW III. So have we.
2007-07-12 11:10:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
It's sad those people died, but it's war, these things happen. The plain and simple fact of the matter is those people were in a building that was harboring terrorists; terrorists that were shooting at Americans.
2007-07-12 11:07:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Terrorism doesn't have a face, it hides behind a mask.
2007-07-12 11:06:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Paul C 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
no the face of terrorism belongs to harry reid. constant grandstanding at the expense of our soldiers has already caused a ripe climate for al qaeda to plan an attack on the us sensing that the liberal extremists of the pelosi/reid regime will let their guard down and according to dc people in the know there is a feel that its infact underway.
2007-07-12 11:09:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
No its war, people are going to die. Terrorism is the cowardly planting of bombs near schools, hospitals and police stations.
2007-07-12 11:07:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋