Dumbest day in American history.
In 2008 please don't drink and vote.
2007-07-12 10:33:38 · 39 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
At least his grandpa didn't fund hitler i wonder if bush's did.....
2007-07-12 10:37:23 · update #1
http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/EPH/8130~George-W-Bush-Monkey-Posters.jpg
2007-07-12 10:35:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 10⤋
No, the dumbest day in American history was when he was selected as the DNC's candidate. Y'know, as much as I am a supporter and wouldn't think of voting for that lying jerk or his wife (especially?), I am enough of a realist to know that George Bush didn't really win re-election--John Kerry lost. If so many hadn't voted against Kerry, our President would not have been able to win again--as he did, thank God!
2007-07-12 10:37:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Amazingly enough, I think Kerry may be more dumb than Bush... at least Bush ran an intelligent campaign. Kerry persists on stepping all over himself. Look how quickly he fell from grace, when he suggested that our troops in the Middle East were too ignorant to go to college... ouch! What if he were in office making stupid comments like that to foreign leaders and diplomats... we may be even farther behind the 8-ball than we are today.
What amazes me is that for the last few elections, I look at all the candidates and say, "Wow! Out of a country of 300M citizens, is this really the best we can dig up for service in the Oval Office?"
Just look at the group with the best odds of winning the top office in '08:
Clinton: She's far too left and arrogant for me, and I don't trust that she'll support the troops who have fought hard for our freedom in the Middle East.
McCain: Commits adultry and leaves an invalid wife for his mistress
Obama: A one-time senator? C'mon
Romney: A one-time governor? C'mon
Edwards: A frivilous lawsuit attorney... no thanks!
Guiliani: Another adulterer who can't seem to make up his mind on who he wants to be with, let alone what political platform he wants to stand on.
It's gonna be another sucky four years if you ask me.
2007-07-12 10:42:39 · answer #3 · answered by one_n1ce_guy 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Let's see, he took the same position as Hanoi Jane Fonda and supported the Vietcong. He lied and put himself up for three purple hearts for paper cuts. He ran from a fire fight, he flip flopped just like Hillary Clinton did so many times and he was the most stupid of the two running. There is a bit more but that should be enough for you to deny.
By the way, the Bushs didn't fund Hitler. You have no proof. They thought MAYBE George's grandfather MIGHT have but they couldn't find anything to support it. It was just another liberal lie just like the one you just told.
2007-07-12 11:48:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
By the Democratic Party pick John Kerry as their presidential nomination it was as if they wanted Bush to win again. Here's hoping for 2 legitimate candidates as opposed to voting for the lesser of two evils.
2007-07-12 10:41:49 · answer #5 · answered by asurasur 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
He's an idiot! "I voted for the war before I voted against it,"
Herman Munster isn't that stiff. He tries sking, dyeing his hair and wind surfing, please, who is he trying to fool? Oh right, halfwits supporters.
He shoots geese on a hunting trip, then leaves them out there? His aid later went running out there to collect the bird carcuses. When asked what he was gonna do with them, he said he was giving them to the local homeless shelter, but when all shelter's where checked within a two hundred mile radius, no one recieved any geese.
Then when all else fails, he gets a puppy for voter apathy. How flipping cheesy!
2007-07-12 10:45:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Because Americans aren't the blind, moronic and incapable blowhards that they appear to be in regards to voting in the presidential elections.
Kerry was the worst possible option that there could have been not only for president, but for the Democratic Party as well. It's safe to say that they regret the day that he ever showed up as a candidate. There's no other way to answer this other than to speak the truth. And the truth is, he's the biggest neanderthal that has ran for president in quite some time. That's why he lost, and thank God that he did.
2007-07-12 10:37:40 · answer #7 · answered by Emma 6 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Kerry lost because he try to be everyone to everybody that was in front of him.
He forgot that people were there recording him.
Kerry also went too far to the left and had the support of Soros and moveon.org.
Which just tick off more people.
My father wasn't such a security risk they transfer from the Atlantic to the Pacific like JFK.
2007-07-12 10:37:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋
John Kerry lost because he didn't have a personality and they did with Bush what they did with Clinton, voted him in a 2nd term for him to finish what he started. Well, at least we did the right thing with Clinton, he had an 8 year pan, got it done in 6. Bush didn't have a plan, and won't have one by the time he is out of office.
2007-07-12 10:39:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Do you think that maybe no one wanted him as president? As far as I can tell to this point, John Kerry is an idiot that changes his mind as the media, oopps, the wind blows. So maybe people figured that if Kerry was president and all of a sudden the media determined that we should be a 3 world nation, he would make it so.
Just a thought.
2007-07-12 10:38:15 · answer #10 · answered by Michael H 5 · 7⤊ 1⤋
He lies. He is liberal. He is aligned with the devil. He claims to be christian but his actions and words speak differently. He supports abortion (which is murder. PERIOD). His policies are socialist. He wants to raise taxes. He is just like Hillary Clinton. He is just like Barack Hussain Obama. He told outrageous lies about his service in the military in Vietnam. His in less qualified than most every politician out there. He is liberal. He is socialist. He doesn't have America's interest at heart. He is power hungry. He tries to by votes by promising social programs which is down right ridiculous. He is liberal. His is a socialist.
That should explain it well enough.
2007-07-12 10:41:03 · answer #11 · answered by Pro-American 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋