English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

That party is as dead as a doornail--thank God!

2007-07-12 10:07:31 · answer #1 · answered by Beau D. Satva 5 · 0 2

Ron Paul would. I disagree with him that we ought to continuously not have long gone to Iraq, as a results of fact i think Saddam became a real probability. yet I do consider him that we ought to continuously have long gone the superb way, with a suited statement of conflict from Congress. some human beings communicate approximately "winning" the conflict, however the "conflict" has already been gained. Our troops gained it in some week. Saddam's been captured, tried, convicted, and carried out. Iraq has an elected government. we've been guidance the Iraqis to combat for themselves for what, 5 years now? Our struggling with adult males and ladies have completed their interest and then some. it's time to deliver them domicile.

2016-10-21 01:03:51 · answer #2 · answered by zaragosa 4 · 0 0

you know, i feel bad for whoever has to clean up the messes g w bush has contributed to making, and to whoever has to clean up the messes these past congresses have contributed to making..

i really don't think the FICKLE people, including myself, can understand the pressure these politicians have brought upon themselves by making these messes....

but if they'd just listened to us in the first place, then they wouldna' considered passing a SHamnesty law for illegal immigrants...

side note..... it's really pathetic that the head of Homeland inSecurity M. Chernoff has to place any blame of the possible future failure of his gvmnt. agency to protect Americans from another 9/11, BECAUSE, according to Chernoff, Americans were against the new immigration legislature.... DO NOT blame the American citizen if an attack occurs, Chernoff... just do your damned job already... "Hell of a job, Brownie..." REMEMBER THAT MESS? Yous gvmnt. 'professionals' need to quit being so damned incompetent.

ENFORCE THE IMMIGRATION LAWS WE HAVE RIGHT NOW, QUIT ARRESTING OUR BORDER GUARDS WHEN THEY ARE DOING THEIR JOB, and illegal immigration will stop.... ALSO STOP GIVING ANY AID TO ILLEGALS WHO ARE HERE, AND THEY WILL GO HOME.

2007-07-12 10:13:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Ron Paul.

http://www.ronpaul08.com

2007-07-12 10:04:32 · answer #4 · answered by jswnwv 3 · 2 3

Any of them would. Its just not going to be immediate or on a published time schedule. You never publish a schedule, your enemy would love it. Lay low and on the day after they leave we attack! - come on now think about it. As far as leaving, of course we are going, but we need to leave behind a stable government capable of keeping iself afloat. we cant just walk off and leave it to a pack of militias and half nuts warlords to establish a working government. regardless of if you agree on why we went in or not, the fact is we are there. And as human beings it is our responsibility to leave them in as good or better shape than we found them in.

2007-07-12 11:00:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Ron Paul. He and Dennis Kucinech were the only congressman who spoke out against the war from the beginning.

Please check him out he is a constitutionalist/ liberatarian who believes in freedoms and upholding our constitution.

Nowdays dems and reps look more and more alike. The dems want to tell you how to spend you money and the reps want to tell you how to live your life. Both want to control. The mainstream candidates are CFR members.. Obama, Hillary, Edwards, Giuliani, McCain, Romney.

Please Please look into RON PAUL.

And if you want to see the best documentary ever on where our country is headed towards please please please
Please watch this movie. Freedom to Fascism.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173

2007-07-12 10:14:52 · answer #6 · answered by Beauty&Brains 4 · 2 0

Heh.

That's a JOKE, right? Because no Republican (in their INSANE mind) would dare bring home the troops.

Not unless...

They're all in body bags.

2007-07-12 10:05:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Ron Paul. On the democrat side, i'd say it is Kucinich or Gravel. Hillary won't, thats for sure.

2007-07-12 10:04:46 · answer #8 · answered by jeb black 5 · 1 1

If he's smart and really cares about the people he won't do that. They'll just follow our troops home. I don't know about you, but I'm not trained to fight terrorists in my back yard.

2007-07-12 10:05:05 · answer #9 · answered by bonsai_kitty66 2 · 0 1

None! Have you been watching the debates. They all support the war in Iraq.

2007-07-12 10:04:39 · answer #10 · answered by Liberal City 6 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers