2007-07-12 09:59:55 · 10 answers · asked by sophia c 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
No, unless he's a widower I suppose.
2007-07-12 10:02:17 · answer #1 · answered by shmux 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in this day and age, people have no honor or respect. A ring on the finger actually makes a person more desirable, and a person with a ring especially women, will probably get hit on more then a person with out a ring.
At least that's the way it seems to me.
2007-07-12 17:13:16 · answer #2 · answered by Ashamed2beHuman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a wedding ring is a symbol of marriage.. that's the point in wearing it
2007-07-12 18:44:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. If he's not married- then its just a ring and honestly, kind of weird.
2007-07-12 17:05:39 · answer #4 · answered by kermit 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not unless he wants some women to leave him alone.
but if he's engaged, then yes, he should wear a ring.
2007-07-12 17:02:40 · answer #5 · answered by Epitome 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he widowed, I can understand.
If he is engaged - well, ok.
If he is a single guy, then it just means he wants to be left alone.
I knew a single guy who used to do this because he said it would attract more women, sadly, it seemed to work.
2007-07-12 17:07:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If he is surrounded by predatory females, yes. It may not stop them, but gives him an out.
2007-07-12 17:13:38 · answer #7 · answered by Sophist 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, if that man wants to give an impression to everyone that he's taken.
2007-07-12 17:51:21 · answer #8 · answered by Lola 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure. Why not. It can make his life less complex.
2007-07-12 18:06:23 · answer #9 · answered by jsardi56 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not unless he's trying to avoid women
2007-07-16 01:16:58 · answer #10 · answered by katte 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋