Will it take an Armageddon event to end the Terrorist War Bush started against America???

Question

Or will we continue on into a Post Apocalyptic struggle of America against radicalized terrorist.

Thanks Bee Real

So now the ShortBus is the one that closed down the CIA office that had the job of bringing Bin Laden to justice.

Answer 1

NO!!! Terrorism has been going on for thousands and thousands of years and will never stop. Seriously, have you heard much about terrorism before 9/11. Bush and his goon squad are just putting fear into the public so what they are doing overseas is justified.

Answer 2

I was under the impression that the terrorists started the fight. During the Clinton administration there was the attempt on the world trade center, the bombing of the USS Cole, and several other lesser attacks. Clinton responded by blowing up an asprin factory that belonged to Ossamma. 9/11 occured and Bush asked the congress for (and was granted) authority to use force in Afganistan and Iraq. The war on terrorism will end when they quit trying to kill us and not before. Until then it is the sworn duty of every us soldier to permit any terrirost who wants to martyr himself on a american bayonette to assist them in doing so.

by the way terrorists were around long before GW Bush. Look up Bader-Meinhoff

Answer 3

as a results of fact Roosevelt did not ought to difficulty approximately colateral injury and civilians. The conflict became gained with terror. Relentless hearth bombing and devastating nuclear units on civilian objectives. there have been no embedded newshounds to scrutinize and criticize each and every shot fired or call each and every American casualty a lost conflict. the click had some ethics then and did not conspire with the enemy. Roosevelt did not ought to difficulty some divided united states crammed with cry toddlers and commie so-noted as 'justice' seekers. Roosevelt did not ought to compete with MTV and a united states of drones being fed lies with regards to the reward of the enemy. back then, just about each and every citizen became against conflict and favourite a sensible place of armed neutrality. yet, as quickly as the attack got here, the gloves got here off and that they knew conflict became conflict. There are not any policies. You combat, you kill everybody interior the way and you win. at present, winning is vilified as evil. you may't end a conflict that way. It is going on continuously. in case you have the desire to make an omlette, be arranged to interrupt some eggs or get out of the kitchen.

Answer 4

I think we need to look at history to end the war in Iraq. The greatest period of peace in present day Iraq (founded in 1920) was under the Ottoman Empire which divided the country into three parts with capitals in Mosul, Basra, and Babylon. ( save conquest by Mongels and Persians with in the period).

Will it take Armageddon? I just dont know.

Answer 5

An Armageddon event will speed up the war on terror because such event, like 9-11, will wake normal americans up to the threat these facist create. But now-a-days we live in our own little bubble so we must have two pearl harbors before people wake-up.

Answer 6

Uhuh. Seriously though, what's with you guys saying EVERYTHING is Bush's fault? One, it takes more than one man to go to war. Two, the "terrorist war" has been going on for centuries, it just wasn't as publicised as it is now. Hell, why don't we blame global warming, earthquakes, and WWII on Bush as well?

Answer 7

Hope not... So, what do you think will stop the Ji had and threats of further terror attacks world wide... Please share. How PC of you to let the 9/11 hijackers off the hook.

Answer 8

Bush never started a war against america. once again deluded liberals jump the intelligence ship.

Answer 9

We are lived by forces we scarcely understand

Answer 10

I sure as hell hope we don't see Armageddon.