Jimminy Cricket
2007-07-12 10:48:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr. BIG 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
J.C. Laker of England was the first cricketer to take 10 wickets in an innings.
He took 10 wickets in 51.2 overs conceding 53 runs in the
2nd innings of the 4th test beteen England and Australia at Old Trafford, Manchester from 26th to 31st July, 1956.
2007-07-12 15:14:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
5⤋
Jim Laker of England
2007-07-13 15:10:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Jim Laker
Muttiah Muralidharan
Anil Kumble
2007-07-13 06:22:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
J.C. Laker of England was the first cricketer to take 10 wickets in an innings.
He took 10 wickets in 51.2 overs conceding 53 runs in the
2nd innings of the 4th test beteen England and Australia at Old Trafford, Manchester from 26th to 31st July, 1956.
Anil also took 10 wickets against Pakistan in a test series. and he was awarded as a MAN OF THE MATCH and MAN OF THE SERIES in that match....
2007-07-13 01:28:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bunny 2
·
0⤊
5⤋
JIM LAKER was the first to take ten wickets in an innings.
2007-07-13 01:00:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sarang 3
·
0⤊
5⤋
JIM LAKER
James Charles Laker (February 9, 1922 – April 23, 1986) was a cricketer who played for England in the 1950s, most famous for "Laker's match" in 1956 at Old Trafford, when he took nineteen wickets in England's victory against Australia.
Born in Frizinghall, near Bradford, Yorkshire, he was known as an elegant off-spin bowler. He consistently performed well against Australian cricket teams, and formed a successful partnership with Tony Lock, a left-arm orthodox spinner. He was also part of the Surrey side that dominated the county championship with seven consecutive titles from 1952 to 1958. He was selected as one of the five Wisden Cricketers of the Year in 1952.
Laker was the first individual to take all 10 wickets in a Test match innings, ten for 53 in the Australians' second innings of the fourth Ashes Test at Old Trafford in 1956 (the only other bowler to take all 10 wickets is Anil Kumble of India in 1999). Having also taken nine for 37 in the first innings, Laker's match bowling figures were nineteen for 90: no other bowler has taken more than seventeen wickets in a first-class match.[1] Laker was married to an Austrian national who did not know much about cricket. On the day of his achievement when he arrived home, his wife asked him, "Jim, did you do something good today?" after she had taken hundreds of congratulatory telephone calls.[2] Remarkably, Laker had also taken all ten wickets in an innings for Surrey against the same Australians earlier in the season.
On England's disastrous tour of Australia in 1958-9, Laker was one of the few England players to enhance his reputation, bowling well on unhelpful pitches.
He played 46 Test matches between 1948 and 1959, taking 193 wickets with a bowling average of 21.24; in all first-class matches he took 1,944 wickets at 18.41.
Apart from his figures in 'Laker's match', the other bowling analysis for which he will be remembered is his 8 wickets for 2 runs in an innings in a Test Trial at Bradford in 1950, playing for England against 'The Rest'.
The publication in 1960 of his ghost-written autobiography, containing severe criticism of his Surrey and England captain Peter May, resulted in his losing honorary memberships of MCC and Surrey. Although these were both eventually restored, he never played for either Surrey or England again.
After his departure from the Surrey team, Laker played occasionally for Auckland. He also played some matches for Essex from 1962 to 1965, but was not the force of old.
In later years Laker was a highly regarded cricket commentator for BBC television. His habit of dropping the final "g" when pronouncing words ending in "ing" attracted much affectionate mimicry. He died in Putney, London
2007-07-12 16:28:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by *-* East Beauty *-* 3
·
0⤊
5⤋
You mean 10 wickets in a single match?
2007-07-12 17:56:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋
1. Jim Laker
2. Anil Kumble
2007-07-12 13:58:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by friend 2
·
0⤊
5⤋
hmmm
well all the above are saying jim laker so it could be him lol
2007-07-13 16:30:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋