English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the photos were not nude,,,but they WERE CRUDE!!!

2007-07-12 06:20:58 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

7 answers

Yes. She will be forever remembered for the scandal and not her platform. How proud America should be of the "Wild GirL" pics. The pics are sleezy.

2007-07-12 06:27:49 · answer #1 · answered by GrnApl 6 · 1 0

No, I do not think that she should. There is nothing all that bad in the photos. A lot of people have a lot worse posted on their MySpace pages.

2007-07-12 13:23:26 · answer #2 · answered by Tony M 7 · 0 2

No, she shouldn't. But it is sad that this is how she chooses to make her way in life, judged by superficial beauty rather than her more precious 'inner' qualities, which will survive age, etc.

2007-07-12 13:24:44 · answer #3 · answered by Icewomanblockstheshot 6 · 0 1

But they were posted in a PRIVATE account, meaning someone hacked into it.... So, since they were obtained "illegally", then no.

2007-07-12 13:23:34 · answer #4 · answered by zippythejessi 7 · 0 1

No, there's no real reason to take her crown.

2007-07-12 13:29:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No.

Why? For being normal?

2007-07-12 13:24:56 · answer #6 · answered by pater47 5 · 0 1

No.

2007-07-12 13:26:01 · answer #7 · answered by kiwi 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers