al-Qaida is.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070712/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_terror_threat
WMD - Bush / AIPAC lies
Saddam's role in 9/11 - Bush / Neocon lies
al-Qaida - Better / stronger than ever.
Thanks Bush, Project for a New American Century, AIPAC and the rest of the Neocons for wasting a Trillion $ and over a hundred thousand total killed in Iraq while we let the terrorists get stronger than ever before.
Dr. Ron Paul warned you years ago of this threat.
http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2003/cr071003.htm
2007-07-12 06:19:32 · 16 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
My solution would be to return the troops home from Iraq (sending some to go after al Qaida in Afghanistan like we were until we had to pull them for this bogus Iraq war), Korea (we have 37,000 troops protecting their 151 mile border) and Europe to save our stretched armed forces.
The money saved by returning Reserve Units back to civilian life will be spent to protect the border. Billions are needed in enforcement, retention centers so we do not "catch and release" millions of illegals, and courts to process and deport every single illegal alien caught on American soil.
We need to protect America - not Korea, not Israel, not Europe, not anywhere else. Our borders are not protected, we are not safer than we were in 2001 and it is absolutely ridiculous that after a trillion dollars spent and over 3,500 American soldiers dead al Qaida is stronger than ever.
2007-07-12 07:00:43 · update #1
No. My taxes are higher, food prices are horrible, so are energy costs. It is not reflected in my paycheck.
2007-07-12 06:23:27 · answer #1 · answered by gone 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
We'll be better off when that bunch that invaded the White House hits the road of no return. That speech this morning just looking at him and all these faces he makes and saying the Methodist, what does the Methodist have to do with the war, except put up with his old hypocrite a**.
2007-07-12 06:28:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I plan to vote for Ron Paul but to answer your question , yes I personally am better off then I was in 2001
2007-07-12 06:24:49 · answer #3 · answered by TyranusXX 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Strange how we no longer hear that from republican candidates, it was Reagan's rallying cry against Carter. Bush didn't use it in 2000 and President Bush didn't use it in 04', wonder why?
2007-07-12 06:23:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Much worse off.
Milk is now $5.50 a gallon isn't this a swell economy? The rich get richer and the more get poorer!
2007-07-12 06:25:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Probably. I no longer pop ecstasy pills while bumping Mars and Mystre. Kinda miss it but I do have more money now. NOt cause of da chimpster though, he ain't taking credit for that.
2007-07-12 06:23:32 · answer #6 · answered by bbbbriggs04 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Yes, I am. I'm not concerned with Dr. Paul's warnings. They're a political opinion, not the gospel.
2007-07-12 06:24:02 · answer #7 · answered by amazin'g 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Financially? Yup. And it's not because of Washington. Both parties suck at handling MY money.
2007-07-12 06:23:50 · answer #8 · answered by @#$%^ 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
YES
Ron Paul is an empty suit
2007-07-12 06:30:55 · answer #9 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Dubya and ***** administration = total failure.
2007-07-12 06:23:11 · answer #10 · answered by Joe M 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋