Do you think our election system would benefit from instant-runoff voting?

Question

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting

Would this do away with the "spoiler effect" and enable more people to vote their conscience? Would it make third parties more viable in the U.S.? Would it create a broader spectrum of dialogue in the political world?

Answer 1

I agree with you. Not only would it be more efficient, and enable people to vote their conscience, it would save a great deal of money each election season. From most of the answers above mine, I would guess that few people really understand how it would work, and how it would benefit our country as a whole. That is what I find scary...

Answer 2

maximum electorate are idiots. they only vote to maintain their government verify coming to their door. there is not any way that they could probably cope with something extra difficult than what we at present have. together as this might supply 0.33-social gathering applicants a extra effective hazard, it in basic terms will never paintings until we've some variety of try until now people can vote. the place I stay, they deliver a bus from the interior sight psychological hosptital and supply the sufferers cigarettes in the event that they comply with bypass vote. in case you are able to not be in charge for your self and are dedicated, how are you able to probably vote? And, once you're on the regular public dole, you do no longer vote. you do no longer make contributions something, so which you don't get a say in how issues are finished. prefer to vote? Get a job and pay taxes like something people. it particularly is that straightforward. And PLEASE do no longer everyone tell me that welfare slackers pay sales tax. they did no longer earn the money, so as that they do no longer seem to be paying the taxes, we are. .

Answer 3

I favor the instant runoff vote because it would give us better results. I don't know which would be more important, having a winner that gets an absolute majority or a winner that beats every other candidate (or at least the winner would be the candidate that beat more candidates than any other candidate). IRV would be a good idea and in my state (Florida), they're considering using it very soon. Thanks!

Answer 4

I don't like the idea very much, since then we have to decide who we like second best and such. It seems like a hassle when we can just chose one. I think third parties are just as likely to be voted for either way. If this were to be used, I'm scared of how many people would hate the idea.

Answer 5

Are you saying everyone should write a name on the ballot instead of having to choose from a select few? Because if that's what your suggesting, then absolutly; Yes.

Answer 6

We already have a runoff system. It's called the electoral college.

Answer 7

I couldn't agree more.

Answer 8

maybe, and maybe not