54 percent of congress thinks that that Bush is probably guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors. So how can Pelosi and democratic candidates run and bet on success in 2008 on Bush's criminal activities, without at LEAST attempting to bring this to justice? Is our country and it's constitution so irrelevant that we ignore that justice should be served?
2007-07-12 05:47:26 · 10 answers · asked by Rosebee 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Probably,think, explaination:
All suspects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
2007-07-12 05:58:15 · update #1
http://www.impeachbush.tv/impeach/
Go to that link to explore all possibilities and reasons to impeach.
2007-07-12 06:05:34 · update #2
just stay out of their own way.
they ain't doin' a very good job of it ,though; what with the permission for war and the blank check they gave the administration.
the dem.s have nothing to feel all warm and fuzzy about!!
2007-07-12 05:53:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Unconstitutional wiretapping Unconstitutional use of "conflict Powers". The conflict on Terror isn't an definitely conflict. it truly is a lot greater like the conflict on drugs. we are scuffling with communities of baddies, no longer international locations. Reagan did no longer declare limitless conflict powers in his conflict on drugs...So technically, Bush don't have "conflict Powers" in any respect, previous the scope such powers persist with directly to Iraq and Afghanistan.... Terrorizing the yank those with established lies approximately Iraq's nuclear capapbility. Terrorizing the yank human beings by ability of elevating the "Terror Alert" point a week earlier than his re-election, then leaving at the back of the entire Terror Alert equipment for some year and a a million/2.... And on a similar time as technically against the regulation, his financial mismanagement of the cost variety, debt and deficit ranges is criminal by ability of any sensible established.
2016-10-19 04:11:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please show me your sources for high crimes. As far as I know, there have been none.
As for 2008, the Dem. party is looking at a monumental failure. Support for Congress is at 14%, just about an all time low. The American public is seeing the failure of the Dem. Congress and will elect a GOP Congress, as most remember the golden days of 2000-2006. This, coupled with a conservative nominee such as Fred Thompson, ensure a GOP landslide victory in 2008!
2007-07-12 05:54:09 · answer #3 · answered by mustagme 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Is this Mike Niphong? The majority of people believed that the Duke players were guilty. They were wrong right? So please tell me what high crimes and misdemeanors are we talking about. Be specific, a petition would have to be specific so you can to.
2007-07-12 06:22:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The best thing the Democrats could do is keep their mouths shut. They've got their own skeletons. Personally I would rather see both parties relugated to the dust bins of history. They both suck.
2007-07-12 05:53:31 · answer #5 · answered by @#$%^ 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They don't really have to do much except keep exposing it to the public...Americans do not like politicians who think they are above the law....thjat is one of the reasons Bush got elected in the first place, because the public did not like Clinton's scandals.
2007-07-12 05:52:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think it's pretty much concluded. To focus on the negative issue of impeaching the traitor this close to his being ousted anyway may be counter productive when the positive focus of electing responsible alternatives can be supported through positive efforts.
2007-07-12 05:51:43 · answer #7 · answered by Don W 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Proably is not proof BTW nice list of crimes
2007-07-12 05:52:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
They think he probably did? Good luck with using that in an election.
2007-07-12 05:53:00 · answer #9 · answered by Brian 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
WHAT ARE YOUR SOURCES FOR THIS QUESTION? SINCE THE DEMOCRATIC CONTROLLED CONGRESS HAS DONE NOTHING BUT INCREASE THE MINIMUM WAGE I DON'T THINK YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.
2007-07-12 05:59:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋