Ok, I'm a liberal. But it's obvious that pres Bush is commited to his goal, (I just watched the Presidential news conference), and if he succeeds in putting a major dent in crazy terrorism, then at least our efforts will have not gone in vain. As much as I disagree with war, I disagree even more with crazy people blowing themselves up in the middle of a shopping center, etc. What if we, as Americans, gave President Bush 100% support for the remainder of his term, and together, blew terrorism off the map? The election is next September, we can do what we want at that time.
2007-07-12 05:07:19 · 22 answers · asked by emcgman 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
If that happened the Bush Administration would probably write more laws that clearly would declare that George W. Bush would be declared Emperor of the planet earth.
He would threaten and order the citizens of the world, including the Queen of England, that they would have to bow in submission to him.
He would also declare that he would own all of the land and oceans of the planet earth as well as everything on it.
Any refusal by any country or citizen would be considered as a grievous crime and the offender would be subject to torture and/or death.
And in order to enforce these new rulings he would bring his almighty Al-CIAda out of hiding and have them train the armed forces of every country and police departments of every state, county and city how to destroy, torture, maim, kill, lie cheat and steal but only at his command for his purposes and/or amusement.
2007-07-12 05:47:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
If the Congress and Media would have stood behind George Bush 100% from 9-11 on we would have never had to Invade Iraq.No Country wants to face a United United States of America.If the Congress would say Today that they back Bush 100% the Neighbors of Iraq would Join in and help in a Heartbeat.No one in the middle east wants to put their life on the line not Knowing for sure the U.S. will complete the work at hand,So if you want to blame someone for the long war Blame the spineless Congress and the Out of Controll Media.
2007-07-12 05:16:50 · answer #2 · answered by john 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The "Surge" in Iraq has been going full tilt for the last three weeks!
The leadership of AlQeda left before it started. They are regrouping and changing their direction.
We should give it a fair amount of time to work and establish a true government in Iraq.
The war on TERROR is another issue. It is a WORLD WAR and many are too blind, ignorant or stupid to see it.
Terrorism will no be controllable until their butts are kicked in every location world-wide and they become so hunted that they formally surrender and every government world-wide establishes anti-terrorist policies.
The general election is a year from next November.
2007-07-12 05:18:48 · answer #3 · answered by Philip H 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush! Obama does not have a conflict in Afghanistan, the militia decrease than Bush ran maximum individuals of terrorist out and freed the rustic. particular it truly is corrupt yet in the past i will assert lots Ithink we ought to continuously preserve our very own corruption. Boxer, Pelosi, Ried, Murser, Jefferson, Frank, Dobbs and Rangle to in elementary terms point out some. Iraq militia decrease than saddam became defeated in some days. It became the terrorist who the left say weren't there who're nevertheless struggling with. So Obama has no conflict to win in basic terms mop up and he's undeceive approximately a thank you to try this. Now he ought to start up a conflict against the Tail ban in Pakistan if he needed to. evidently that the U. S. and Pakistan are working mutually. yet back there is communicate approximately corrupt governments via the media, i assume they advise in assessment to China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Palestine.
2016-10-21 00:15:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm conservative, but I still respect others views. I think we should not only support the President, because he is our leader. But people have to remember that the people in the middle east are our soldiers and they need support from everyone! When we have a bunch of people arguing over here about what is right or wrong, the soldiers are going to forget who they are fighting for. I wish we could support Bush 100% but lets face it thats never going to happen.
2007-07-12 05:18:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The idea has it's merits. We might actually get something done and congress might stop wasting everyones time with investigation after investigation at a time of war.
However Bush Derangment Syndrome is a very real thing and would prevent that from ever happening.
2007-07-12 05:16:45 · answer #6 · answered by WCSteel 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The election is next November by the way. But I think it would be nice if he had full support. It would have been nice 5 years ago and this would have been a story of the past, but I'm not turning down anyone who wants to do the right thing for this country.
2007-07-12 05:11:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If people pulled together like they used to (WWII and prior), we could have an effective strategy that included beating some terrorist a$$ and achieving victory in Iraq. Unfortunately too many people put their allegiance to the democrat party over their allegiance to the country. When in time this happened I do not know but the partisanship at the expense of the nation is BS.
2007-07-12 05:12:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Thank you for your optimism. Unfortunately, I think the guys up on the hill(both sides) are more concerned with the next term winner, than they are with supporting the current. I salute your patriotism sir!
2007-07-12 05:19:12 · answer #9 · answered by xooxcable 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
All the liberals would stomp their little feet and soil their undies.
2007-07-12 05:14:46 · answer #10 · answered by randy 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋