"On CNN's Crossfire on October 20, 2000, Larry Flynt exploded a bombshell: that he has evidence that George W. Bush was "involved in an abortion in Texas" in the early 1970's - when abortions were still illegal."
Larry Flint has been the undoing of a number of Republican lawmakers, such as Vitter. So much for family values.
The transcript can be found here:
http://archive.democrats.com/display.cfm?id=159
2007-07-12 02:03:02 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Satan's : Exactl;y !!
2007-07-12 02:10:32 · update #1
This is the problem with this story:
If it were true and the woman and/or her friends that have knowledge of this are not speaking. Maybe they are being intimidated but that would only be speculation... Facts don't work off on speculation or at least credible sources.
Also, even if this were true this event happened in 1970... a person can change their mind about a issue; we criticize people on here so much for changing their minds. I would agree that it would be hypocritical because Bush does not seem to sympathize with people who seek abortions BUT that does not mean he can't change his mind (and this is 1970... that's 40 years ago!!!!).
The only real disturbing thing about this (if it were true) would be that he committed a crime by seeking a abortion procedure... but I think most people believe he used cocaine frequently and that is a crime. This is more serious but I don't know the statute of limitations in Texas.
I hate this president but he should not be accused of something like this without better evidence than this. If the woman comes forward then I will listen.
2007-07-12 02:19:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
And Larry Flynt is crack investigative reporter working for whom?
So what?
If he's not a reporter (which he isn't) then he has a hidden motive - like running down the Republicans.
If he IS a reporter (Yeah-Right) then he should be fired by his news agency for denying them the story.
If there were a REAL story here, then where is the media hype? This "bombshell" was released just prior to the 2000 election and the news media missed the "bombshell"??
I think not.
This is a "no story." Larry Flynt is a sleaze bag without scrupples or morals.
2007-07-12 02:17:08 · answer #2 · answered by 8-) Nurf Herder 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i presumed that Keisha female of the extra youthful band Sugarbabes became truly warm. yet i think of she's piled the burden on presently and its spoiled an excellent physique. She additionally has a stable "black" voice hidden away there and is wasted in the form of stupid troupe. Yeah. an excellent finding female nevertheless with verve. I easily have a concern approximately "cheeky confronted" women. lol Questions spoke back: 2) My relatives friends and human dignity. 3) humorous issues are going on to and around me each and every of the time cos i recognize such lots of mad extraordinary balls. 4) Saddest concern properly I dont choose to % out a individual. besides it became a lacking persons poster I observed the day gone by which shook me to the middle. I dont stay to tell the story unhappiness. Whats the use ? we ought to arise combat back and help out. 5) i'm ?? = mildly stoned on the 2d. superb. No celebrity. Too lived in for "crushes". Theyre cool whilst youre youthful nevertheless say whilst youre teenaged. stable questions. Ta !
2016-10-20 23:52:04 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow... what a load.
Who is "smirk"?
I wonder why they didn't say Anna Nicole was the mother-to-be.
Your tabloid website offers the quote from CNN with nothing in it, but say it has been "scrubbed" by CNN
Look.. If CNN had some dirt on the President... they'd be wailing it from the minarets
2007-07-12 02:11:42 · answer #4 · answered by gcbtrading 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Larry Flynt??? The porn king?
Who pays attention to that creep? Certainly not me.
If he said the sky was blue and grass was green, I'd check to make sure it was still true!
2007-07-12 02:11:08 · answer #5 · answered by Free To Be Me 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
OOOh! Larry Flint. Top notch source, eh! Yeah he is really good at defaming republicans. And you actually believe him. Doesn't say much for your integrity.
2007-07-13 03:45:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So what.... to each his own. If you are against abortion so be it but let other people make the choice themselves. I would never have an abortion because I would not be able to live with myself but if someone else felt the need to have one, go for it...
2007-07-12 02:11:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Please explain what this has to do with the year 2007.
I'm typically not a Bush defender, but in this case I'll have to defend him. I'd be more scared of a person who hadn't evolved/changed since the 70's than one who has.
2007-07-12 02:12:09 · answer #8 · answered by rrm38 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Is it so unbeleivable for someone to change there opinion on something over 40 years?
2007-07-12 02:14:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow. Bush got laid 30 years ago. Shocking.
2007-07-12 02:11:30 · answer #10 · answered by open4one 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋